James Robert Stanford v. D. Paramo
| James Robert Stanford |
| D. Paramo |
| 5:2019cv00276 |
| February 12, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Charles F Eick |
| Stephen V Wilson |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. The Court is in receipt of Petitioner's "Request for Extension of Time to File a Reply," filed 4/10/19. Petitioner may file a Reply on or before 4/29/19. (sp) |
| Filing 14 REQUEST for Extension of Time to File a Reply filed by Petitioner James Robert Stanford. (sp) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE OF LODGING filed re Return to Habeas Petition (2254) #12 (Attachments: #1 Lodgment 1 Part 1, #2 Lodgment 1 Part 2, #3 Lodgment 2 Part 1, #4 Lodgment 2 Part 2, #5 Lodgment 3, #6 Lodgment 4, #7 Lodgment 5, #8 Lodgment 6, #9 Lodgment 7, #10 Lodgment 8, #11 Lodgment 9, #12 Lodgment 10, #13 Lodgment 11, #14 Lodgment 12, #15 Lodgment 13, #16 Lodgment 14, #17 Lodgment 15, #18 Lodgment 16, #19 Lodgment 17, #20 Lodgment 18, #21 Lodgment 19, #22 Lodgment 20, #23 Lodgment 21)(Delgado-Rucci, David) |
| Filing 12 Answer to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254), #1 filed by Respondent D. Paramo. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of the Answer to the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus)(Delgado-Rucci, David) |
| Filing 11 FINANCIAL ENTRY: Received $5.00 into the registry of the Court from State of California. Re: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254), #1 . Receipt number RS010052. (lmu) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Errata, #8 . The following error(s) was/were found: Title page is missing. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (sbou) |
Filing 9
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick: granting #7 . Good cause having been shown, Respondent's Application for a 30-day enlargement of time in which to file an Answer is granted. The Answer is due on or before 4/13/19. (sp)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Respondent D. Paramo. correcting EX PARTE APPLICATION to Extend Time to File Answer to 4/15/2019 re Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254), #1 #7 [submitting Certificate of Service which was inadvertently omitted when Document 7 was electronically filed] (Delgado-Rucci, David) |
| Filing 7 EX PARTE APPLICATION to Extend Time to File Answer to 4/15/2019 re Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254), #1 filed by respondent D. Paramo. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Delgado-Rucci, David) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney David Delgado-Rucci on behalf of Respondent D. Paramo (Attachments: #1 Declaration [Certificate of Service])(Attorney David Delgado-Rucci added to party D. Paramo(pty:res))(Delgado-Rucci, David) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. It is Ordered that Petitioner shall serve upon Respondent or, if appearance has been entered by counsel, upon Respondent's attorneys, a copy of every future pleading or other document submitted for consideration by the Court. (sp)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER REQUIRING ANSWER TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS by Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. It is Ordered that Respondent file an Answer to the Petition within 23 days of the date of this Order. All lodged documents must be numbered sequentially. Each lodged document must be stapled or otherwise securely fastened, and must bear the lodgment number and case number on the first page of the document. It is Further Ordered that, if Petitioner desires to file a Reply to the Answer, Petitioner shall do so within 15 days of the date that the Answer is filed. It is Further Ordered that Respondent shall give timely notice of any court proceeding to any person who is a "crime victim" within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. section 3771. Notice: The court has issued a ruling on preliminary review. Pursuant to the Agreement on Acceptance of Service between the Clerk of Court and the California Attorney Generals Office, this Notice constitutes service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. (Attachments: #1 Petition part 1, #2 Petition part 2, #3 Petition part 3, #4 Notice, #5 Election) (sp)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Stephen V. Wilson and referred to Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (Attachments: #1 CV111 Notice Re Discrepancies in Filing of Habeas Corpus Petition, #2 CV-60P) (car) |
| Filing 2 ELECTION REGARDING CONSENT to Proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge Declined, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636c filed by Petitioner James Robert Stanford. The Petitioner does not consent. (car) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In State Custody (28:2254) Case assigned to Judge Stephen V. Wilson and referred to Magistrate Judge Charles F Eick.(Filing fee $ 5. FEE DUE), filed by Petitioner James Robert Stanford. (Attachments: #1 Part 2 of Petition, #2 Part 3 of Petition) (car) (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/14/2019: #3 Envelope) (car). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: James Robert Stanford v. D. Paramo | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: James Robert Stanford | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: D. Paramo | |
| Represented By: | David Delgado-Rucci |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
