Adam Lentner v. City of Fontana et al
| ADAM LENTNER |
| CITY OF FONTANA, OFFICER JOHN PARSONS, DOES 1-10, inclusive, OFFICER CHRISTOPHER GONAZLES, Christopher Gonzalez and John Parsons |
| 5:2019cv00277 |
| February 12, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jesus G Bernal |
| Kenly Kiya Kato |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendants All Defendants amending Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , filed by plaintiff Adam Lentner(Terrell, James) |
Filing 13
ORDER by Judge Jesus G. Bernal, Granting Joint Stipulation to Allow Plaintiff to Amend Complaint and Extend Defendant's Time to Respond to Amended Complaint #12 . See document for further information. (twdb)
|
| Filing 12 Joint STIPULATION for Extension of Time to Amend Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendants City of Fontana, Christopher Gonzalez, John Parsons. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Attorney S Frank Harrell added to party City of Fontana(pty:dft), Attorney S Frank Harrell added to party Christopher Gonzalez(pty:dft), Attorney S Frank Harrell added to party John Parsons(pty:dft))(Harrell, S) |
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Adam Lentner, upon Defendant Christopher Gonzalez served on 3/13/2019, answer due 4/3/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Kathy Kasinger, designated to accept service in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Terrell, James) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Adam Lentner, upon Defendant John Parsons served on 3/13/2019, answer due 4/3/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Kathy Kasinger, designated to accept service in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Terrell, James) |
| Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Adam Lentner, upon Defendant City of Fontana served on 3/13/2019, answer due 4/3/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Kathy Kasinger, designated to accept service in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (Terrell, James) |
|
Filing 8
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Jesus G. Bernal. (ima)
|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants City of Fontana, Christopher Gonzalez, John Parsons. (jtil) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff ADAM LENTNER, identifying Defendants. (Terrell, James) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff ADAM LENTNER. (Terrell, James) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff ADAM LENTNER. (Terrell, James) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-23203633 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff ADAM LENTNER. (Attorney James Stephen Terrell added to party ADAM LENTNER(pty:pla))(Terrell, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
