Patricia Filardi v. California Food Management, LLC et al
Patricia Filardi |
CALIFORNIA FOOD MANAGEMENT, LLC, a California limited liability company, dba Burger King #9514, Does 1-10, Inclusive,, TEMCAL DEVELOPMENT CORP., a California corporation, Does 1-10, inclusive, Temcal Development Corp. and California Food Management, LLC |
5:2019cv00355 |
February 25, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Percy Anderson |
Shashi H Kewalramani |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. § 12101 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Patricia Filardi. Dismissal is With Prejudice. (Manning, Joseph) |
Filing 16 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Percy Anderson re: Notice of Settlement #15 . The Court has been advised by counsel that this matter has settled. The parties have ten (10) days from the date of this order or until the next scheduled court appearance, whichever is shorter, to file with the court a dismissal of the action or to appear, in-person or telephonically with their clients, to place the settlement on the record. (mrgo) |
Filing 15 NOTICE of Settlement filed by Plaintiff Patricia Filardi. (Manning, Joseph) |
Filing 14 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS - Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal For Lack Of Prosecution by Judge Percy Anderson. (Show Cause Response due by 4/12/2019.) (mrgo) |
Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Patricia Filardi, upon Defendant Temcal Development Corp. served on 3/12/2019, answer due 4/2/2019. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at home address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Manning, Joseph) |
Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Patricia Filardi, upon Defendant California Food Management, LLC served on 3/11/2019, answer due 4/1/2019. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Manning, Joseph) |
Filing 11 STANDING ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. (mrgo) |
Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Temcal Development Corp. (et) |
Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant California Food Management, LLC. (et) |
Filing 8 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (kss) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Percy Anderson and Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. (et) |
Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Patricia Filardi. (Manning, Joseph) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Patricia Filardi. (Manning, Joseph) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Patricia Filardi, (Manning, Joseph) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Patricia Filardi. (Manning, Joseph) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-23269101 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Patricia Filardi. (Attorney Joseph Richard Manning, Jr added to party Patricia Filardi(pty:pla))(Manning, Joseph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.