Fernando Meza et al v. General Motors Financial Company, Inc. et al
Fernando Meza and Brynne Meza |
EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC, Trans Union, LLC and General Motors Financial Company, Inc. |
5:2019cv00449 |
March 12, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 filed by Plaintiffs Brynne Meza, Fernando Meza. (Hartman, Jared) |
Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 filed by Plaintiffs Brynne Meza, Fernando Meza. (Hartman, Jared) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 filed by Plaintiffs Brynne Meza, Fernando Meza. (Hartman, Jared) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Fernando Meza, Brynne Meza All Plaintiffs, identifying Plaintiffs. (Hartman, Jared) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs Brynne Meza, Fernando Meza. (Hartman, Jared) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-23357698 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiffs Fernando Meza, Brynne Meza. (Attorney Jared M Hartman added to party Brynne Meza(pty:pla), Attorney Jared M Hartman added to party Fernando Meza(pty:pla))(Hartman, Jared) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.