David Quair III v. CO Johnson et al
David Sabino Quair, III, Diva Moonchild Quair and David S Quair, III |
CO Beauchamp, CO Brown, CO Johnson, CO Medrano and CO Carson |
5:2019cv00587 |
April 2, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Philip S Gutierrez |
Autumn D Spaeth |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth granting #2 APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. It is further ORDERED that the prisoner-plaintiff owes the Court the initial filing fee of $350.00. An initial partial filing fee of $2.00 must be paid within 30 days of the date of this order. Thereafter, monthly payments shall be forwarded to the Court in accordance with this order. (kh) |
RECOMMENDATION issued by Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth re Complaint (Prisoner Civil Rights) #1 . Proposed Order forwarded to the District Judge for approval.(kh) |
Filing 11 CERTIFIED TRUST ACCOUNT STATEMENT filed by Plaintiff David S Quair, III. (kh) |
Filing 10 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE filed by Plaintiff David S Quair, III re Order to Show Cause #7 . (kh) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Submission of Voluminous Exhibits/Documents by Mail filed by Plaintiff David S Quair, III. (Attachments: #1 Part 2)(kh) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Submission of Voluminous Exhibits/Documents by Mail filed by Plaintiff David S Quair, III. (Attachments: #1 Part 2)(kh) |
Filing 7 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASES SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO FILE CERTIFIED TRUST ACCOUNT STATEMENTS by Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth: Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE by no later than June 3, 2019 why the Court should not recommend denial of the requests to proceed without prepayment of filing fees in all eighteen of the above-captioned cases for failure to establish indigency, including failure to attach a certified trust account statement. Plaintiff may do so by providing a copy of the certified trust account statement from prison officials and any/all information required for the Court to grant Plaintiff's request to proceed without prepayment of fees. If Plaintiff no longer wishes to pursue one or all of these complaints, Plaintiff may file a voluntary dismissal of that specific complaint. (Attachments: #1 Blank Dismissal) (kh) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: Due to clerical error Re: Exhibit #4 : Docketed under the incorrect case number. Document has been correctly docketed under correct case number 5:19-cv-00087-PSG-ADS. (kh) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Submission of Voluminous Exhibits/Documents by Mail filed by Plaintiff David Sabino Quair, III.(kh) |
RECOMMENDATION issued by Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth re APPLICATION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis #2 . Proposed Order forwarded to the District Judge for approval.(kh) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Philip S. Gutierrez and referred to Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (esa) |
Filing 2 APPLICATION to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs filed by plaintiff David Sabino Quair, III. (esa) |
Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed against defendants Beauchamp, Brown, Carson, Johnson, Medrano pursuant to 42 USC 1983pr. Case assigned to Judge Philip S. Gutierrez and referred to Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth, filed by plaintiff David Sabino Quair, III. (esa) Modified on 4/3/2019 (esa). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.