Amy Silva v. United States of America
Amy Silva |
United States of America |
5:2019cv00626 |
April 8, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Percy Anderson |
Prisoner: Vacate Sentence |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS - NOTICE OF REENTRY OF JUDGMENT AND COMMITMENT ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson re: Motion to Vacate/Set Aside/Correct Sentence (2255) #1 . Because reentry of the Judgment and Probation/Commitment Order provides Defendant with a right to direct appeal to the extent permitted in her plea agreement, Defendant's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2255 (Docket No. 83 in Case No. EDCR 17-117 PA and Docket No. 1 in Case No. EDCV 19-626 PA) is denied as moot and dismissed without prejudice to her refiling of that Motion once her direct appeal is exhausted. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (mrgo) |
Filing 5 GOVERNMENT'S NON-OPPOSITION TO VACATUR AND RE-ENTRY OF JUDGMENT REGARDING DEFENDANT AMY SILVA filed by Respondent United States of America re: Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,,, #3 (Ryan, David) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE of Assistant United States Attorney on behalf of Plaintiff-Respondent United States of America. (Attorney David T Ryan added to party United States of America(pty:res))(Ryan, David) |
Filing 3 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Percy Anderson. On April 8, 2019 #1 , petitioner Amy Silva (Petitioner), proceeding pro se, filed a Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2255 (Motion). In her motion, Petitioner, who entered a guilty plea with an appeal waiver, asserts that she instructed her counsel to file a Notice of Appeal, but that counsel failed to do so. The Court therefore orders the government to notify the Court in writing if it seeks an order setting a briefing schedule and an evidentiary hearing or if it instead elects to have the Court vacate and reenter judgment allowing the appeal to proceed to the extent permitted by the plea agreement. The government's notice of election shall be filed no later than April 24, 2019. IT IS SO ORDERED. (lom) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Percy Anderson for motion filed under 28 U.S.C. 2255. (car) |
Filing 1 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence pursuant to 28 USC 2255 assigned to Judge Percy Anderson. For docketing entries refer to CR Case # 5:17-cr-00117-PA, filed by Petitioner Amy Silva. (car) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Amy Silva v. United States of America | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Amy Silva | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: United States of America | |
Represented By: | Assistant 2241-2255 US Attorney LA-CR |
Represented By: | David T Ryan |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.