Jon Edward Flores v. W.L. Montgomery
Petitioner: Jon Edward Flores
Respondent: W. L. Montgomery
Case Number: 5:2019cv00677
Filed: April 15, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: John E McDermott
Referring Judge: Manuel L Real
2 Judge: Stephen V Wilson
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 9, 2019 Filing 12 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT OF CASE due to Unavailability of Judicial Officer filed. The previously assigned District Judge is no longer available. Pursuant to directive of the Chief District Judge and in accordance with the rules of this Court, the case has been returned to the Clerk for reassignment. This case has been reassigned to Judge Stephen V. Wilson for all further proceedings. Case number will now read as 2:19-cv-00677 SVW(JEM). (rn)
June 24, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR STAY AND ABEYANCE (Docket No. #2 ) by Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. No later than August 26, 2019, Petitioner shall file a status report. (See document for details.) (sbou)
May 28, 2019 Filing 10 NOTICE OF NON-OPPOSITION to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Stay Case pending exhaustion of state claims #2 filed by Respondent W. L. Montgomery. (Rogers, Daniel)
May 23, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO FILE A MOTION TO DISMISS OR ANSWER by Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. It is hereby ORDERED as follows: The time within which to file response to the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is enlarged until June 19, 2019, re #7 . (et)
May 20, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Stay Case pending exhaustion of state claims #2 . Respondent shall file an opposition to the Motion no later May 28, 2019. Petitioner may reply to the opposition no later than June 11, 2019. This matter will be deemed submitted on either: (a) the day the opposition is filed, or due and not filed; or (b) the day the reply is filed, or due and not filed. The parties will be notified of the Court's decision in writing. (san)
May 20, 2019 Filing 7 APPLICATION for Enlargement of Time to File Motion to Dismiss or Answer filed by Respondent W. L. Montgomery. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Rogers, Daniel)
May 8, 2019 Filing 6 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Daniel Brian Rogers counsel for Respondent W. L. Montgomery. Adding Daniel Rogers as counsel of record for Warren L. Montgomery for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Respondent Warren L. Montgomery. (Attorney Daniel Brian Rogers added to party W. L. Montgomery(pty:res))(Rogers, Daniel)
April 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER REQUIRING RESPONSE TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AND INSTRUCTIONS GOVERNING FURTHER PROCEEDINGS by Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott: that Respondent W. L. Montgomery file Answer to the Petition not later than 5/20/2019. Notice: The court has issued a ruling on preliminary review. Pursuant to the Agreement on Acceptance of Service between the Clerk of Court and the California Attorney Generals Office, this Notice constitutes service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. Motions to Dismiss shall be filed by 5/20/2019. Traverse due by 6/17/2019 (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1) (sbou)
April 15, 2019 Filing 4 ELECTION REGARDING CONSENT to Proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge Declined, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636c filed by petitioner Jon Edward Flores. The petitioner does not consent. (esa)
April 15, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Manuel L. Real and referred to Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (Attachments: #1 CV 111) (esa)
April 15, 2019 Filing 2 MOTION TO STAY AND ABEY or Stay Petition and Dismiss Unexhausted Claims; DECLARATION of John Edward Flores filed by petitioner Jon Edward Flores. (esa)
April 15, 2019 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In State Custody (28:2254) Case assigned to Judge Manuel L. Real and referred to Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott,(Filing fee $ 5 due), filed by petitioner Jon Edward Flores. (esa) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/18/2019: #1 Trust Account Statement) (san).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jon Edward Flores v. W.L. Montgomery
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jon Edward Flores
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: W. L. Montgomery
Represented By: Daniel Brian Rogers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?