Denise Kish v. Claires Boutiques, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Denise Kish
Defendant: Does 1-10 and Claires Boutiques, Inc.
Case Number: 5:2019cv00681
Filed: April 16, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Andre Birotte
Referring Judge: Sheri Pym
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 5, 2019 Filing 12 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by plaintiff Denise Kish. Dismissal is without prejudice. (Carson, Chris)
May 14, 2019 Filing 11 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Claires Boutiques, Inc. answer now due 6/14/2019, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Claires Boutiques, Inc..(Attorney Karin Bohmholdt added to party Claires Boutiques, Inc.(pty:dft))(Bohmholdt, Karin)
May 1, 2019 Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Denise Kish, upon Defendant Claires Boutiques, Inc. served on 4/24/2019, answer due 5/15/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Agent for Service of Process: REGISTERED AGENT SOLUTIONS, INC. / Trisha Rosano in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell)
April 17, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (cb)
April 17, 2019 Filing 8 Notice to Parties: ADA Disability Access Litigation. (cb)
April 16, 2019 Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Claires Boutiques, Inc. (et)
April 16, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et)
April 16, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Andre Birotte Jr and Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. (et)
April 16, 2019 Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Denise Kish. (Handy, Russell)
April 16, 2019 Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Denise Kish, (Handy, Russell)
April 16, 2019 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Denise Kish. (Handy, Russell)
April 16, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-23555294 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Denise Kish. (Attorney Russell C Handy added to party Denise Kish(pty:pla))(Handy, Russell)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Denise Kish v. Claires Boutiques, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Claires Boutiques, Inc.
Represented By: Karin Bohmholdt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Denise Kish
Represented By: Raymond George Ballister, Jr
Represented By: Phyl Grace
Represented By: Dennis Jay Price, II
Represented By: Russell C Handy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?