Jason Holloway v. 3M Company, et al
Plaintiff: Jason Holloway
Defendant: 3M Company and Does 1 through 50, inclusive
Case Number: 5:2019cv00708
Filed: April 18, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Kenly Kiya Kato
Referring Judge: John A Kronstadt
Nature of Suit: Labor: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 28, 2019 Filing 13 Opposition Opposition re: EX PARTE APPLICATION to Continue THE DEADLINE FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE HIS MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 23-3 from JULY 17, 2019 to NOVEMBER 14, 2019 #11 filed by Defendant 3M Company. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Maria C. Roberts, #2 Exhibit 1 to Declaration of Maria C. Roberts, #3 Exhibit 2 to Declaration of Maria C. Roberts, #4 Exhibit 3 to Declaration of Maria C. Roberts, #5 Exhibit 4 to Declaration of Maria C. Roberts, #6 Exhibit 5 to Declaration of Maria C. Roberts, #7 Exhibit 6 to Declaration of Maria C. Roberts, #8 Exhibit 7 to Declaration of Maria C. Roberts, #9 Exhibit 8 to Declaration of Maria C. Roberts, #10 Declaration Declaration of Dessi N. Day, #11 Proof of Service)(Roberts, Maria)
June 28, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER RE PLAINTIFFS EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR ORDER CONTINUING THE DEADLINE FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE HIS MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION (DKT. 11) by Judge John A. Kronstadt: The Court GRANTS IN PART the Application. Upon review of the parties Joint Rule 16(b)/26(f) Report, the Court will set the date for the filing of the motion. The July 17, 2019 deadline to file the motion pursuant to the Local Rule is vacated. (shb)
June 27, 2019 Filing 11 EX PARTE APPLICATION to Continue THE DEADLINE FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE HIS MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 23-3 from JULY 17, 2019 to NOVEMBER 14, 2019 filed by Plaintiff Jason Holloway. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Kayvon Sabourian, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G, #9 Exhibit H, #10 Exhibit I, #11 Exhibit J, #12 Exhibit K, #13 Proposed Order) (Sabourian, Kayvon)
June 21, 2019 Filing 10 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan and Rule 16(b) Report ; estimated length of trial 20 days, filed by Plaintiff Jason Holloway.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Schedule of Pretrial and Trial Dates)(Sabourian, Kayvon)
April 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER SETTING RULE 16(b)/26(f)SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge John A. Kronstadt. (SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS) (yl)
April 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 STANDING ORDERS FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT by Judge John A. Kronstadt. (SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS) (yl)
April 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 STANDING ORDERS FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT by Judge John A. Kronstadt. (SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS) (yl)
April 25, 2019 Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant 3M Company. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Roberts, Maria)
April 18, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa)
April 18, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT of Eastern Division Removal Case. This case was initially assigned to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and referred to Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato for discovery. Pursuant to General Order 19-03, this case has been randomly reassigned to District Judge John A. Kronstadt. The case number on all documents filed with the Court in this case should read as follows: 5:19-cv-00708 JAK (KKx). (esa)
April 18, 2019 Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant 3M Company, (Roberts, Maria)
April 18, 2019 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant 3M Company. (Roberts, Maria)
April 18, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from County of San Bernardino, case number CIVDS1907761 Receipt No: 0973-23571477 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant 3M Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 to Notice of Removal, #2 Declaration of Hilda Reyes, #3 Proof of Service) (Attorney Maria C Roberts added to party 3M Company(pty:dft))(Roberts, Maria)
April 18, 2019 CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against defendants 3M Company, Does 1 through 50, inclusive, Jury Demand, filed by plaintiff Jason Holloway. (Filed in state court 3/14/19, submitted as document 1, attachment 1) (esa)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jason Holloway v. 3M Company, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jason Holloway
Represented By: Matthew John Matern
Represented By: Launa Adolph
Represented By: Kayvon Sabourian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: 3M Company
Represented By: Dessislava N Day
Represented By: Maria C Roberts
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 50, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?