Christina Caldwell v. Bloomin Brands, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Christina Caldwell
Defendant: Bloomin Brands, Inc., Does 1 through 100 inclusive and Bloomin Brands, Inc. a corporation doing business as Fleming's Prime Steakhouse and Winebar
Case Number: 5:2019cv00754
Filed: April 24, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Dolly M Gee
Referring Judge: Michael R Wilner
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 13, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 3 by Judge Dolly M. Gee. Case ordered to a private mediator based upon a stipulation of the parties or by the court order. Counsel are directed to contact the private mediator of their choice to arrange a date and time for the mediation. ADR Proceeding to be held no later than 5-19-20. Joint status report re settlement due by: 5-26-20. (lom)
June 13, 2019 Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Christina Caldwell, served on 06/11/2019. (Danz, Stephen)
June 13, 2019 Filing 11 INITIAL DISCLOSURE of INITIAL DISCLOSURE filed by Plaintiff Christina Caldwell (Danz, Stephen)
June 13, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 SCHEDULING AND CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER FOR JURY TRIAL by Judge Dolly M. Gee. The Court deems a Scheduling Conference unnecessary and hereby vacates the hearing. Final Pretrial Conference set for 6/16/2020 02:00 PM before Judge Dolly M. Gee. Jury Trial set for 7/14/2020 08:30 AM before Judge Dolly M. Gee. See document for further details. (Attachments: #1 Schedule of Pretrial and Trial Dates) (gk)
May 31, 2019 Filing 9 STATEMENT Joint Case Management & Rule 26(f) Report filed by Defendant Bloomin Brands, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Nageotte, Kyle)
April 26, 2019 Filing 8 SCHEDULING MEETING OF COUNSEL [Fed. R. Civ. P. 16, 26(f)] by Judge Dolly M. Gee. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 5/31/2019. Scheduling Conference set for 6/14/2019 at 9:30 a.m. (See order for details.) (kti)
April 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dolly M. Gee. (kti)
April 26, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney James M Peterson on behalf of Defendant Bloomin Brands, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Peterson, James)
April 26, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap)
April 26, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT of Eastern Division Removal Case. This case was initially assigned to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and referred to Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner for discovery. Pursuant to General Order 19-03, this case has been randomly reassigned to District Judge Dolly M. Gee. The case number on all documents filed with the Court in this case should read as follows: 5:19-cv-00754 DMG (MRWx). (ghap)
April 24, 2019 CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Bloomin Brands, Inc., Does 1 through 100 inclusive. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiff Christina Caldwell. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 3/18/2019 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT A) (ghap)
April 24, 2019 NON CONFORM COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant Bloomin Brands, Inc. (SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT C)(ghap)
April 24, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Bloomin' Brands, Inc., (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Nageotte, Kyle)
April 24, 2019 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Bloomin' Brands, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Nageotte, Kyle)
April 24, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Riverside Superior Court, case number P.S.C. 1901896 Receipt No: 0973-23609523 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Bloomin' Brands, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Summons, #3 Exhibit C - Answer to Complaint, #4 Demand for Jury Trial, #5 Proof of Service) (Attorney Kyle William Nageotte added to party Bloomin' Brands, Inc.(pty:dft))(Nageotte, Kyle)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Christina Caldwell v. Bloomin Brands, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christina Caldwell
Represented By: Stephen F Danz
Represented By: Brian I Vogel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bloomin Brands, Inc.
Represented By: James M Peterson
Represented By: Kyle William Nageotte
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 100 inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bloomin Brands, Inc. a corporation doing business as Fleming's Prime Steakhouse and Winebar
Represented By: James M Peterson
Represented By: Kyle William Nageotte
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?