Raymond Jenkins v. Apple Valley Sheriff Dep.
| Raymond Jenkins |
| Apple Valley Sheriff Dep. |
| 5:2019cv00859 |
| May 7, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Andre Birotte |
| Sheri Pym |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER RE REQUEST TO PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FILING FEES by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: Denying #4 REQUEST to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees, and this case is hereby DISMISSED immediately. IT WAS RECOMMENDED that the Request to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees be DENIED by Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. Reasons: Inadequate showing of indigency. Frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Failure to authorize disbursements from prison trust account to pay the filing fees. Failure to provide certified copy of trust fund statement for the last six months. Leave to amend would be futile. This denial may constitute a strike under the "Three Strikes" provision governing the filing of prisoner suits. No IFP application submitted; possibly barred by Younger or Heck. See document for further details. ( MD JS-6, Case Terminated. ) (gk)
|
| Filing 3 ORIGINAL file, certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received from California Southern |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Andre Birotte Jr and referred to Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. (lh) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF FILING OF COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FILING FEES OR REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (CV-93) (lh) |
| Filing 2 Case transferred to District of Central District of California, Eastern Division. Files transferred electronically to: *District of Central District of California, Eastern Division*.*George E. Brown, Jr. Federal Building and United States Courthouse, 3470 Twelfth St.**Riverside, CA 92501-3801*. Signed by Chief Judge Larry Alan Burns on 5/6/2019. (Attachments: #1 Transfer Order) (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jdt) [Transferred from California Southern on 5/8/2019.] |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Apple Valley Sheriff Dep., filed by Raymond Jenkins.($400 Filing Fee, Fee Not Paid, IFP Not Filed) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:19-cv-489-LAB-KSC. Judge Larry Alan Burns and Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford are assigned to the case.[Case in Screening per 28 USC 1915] (jms) [Transferred from California Southern on 5/8/2019.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Raymond Jenkins v. Apple Valley Sheriff Dep. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Raymond Jenkins | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Apple Valley Sheriff Dep. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
