Hung T. Trinh v. Nancy A. Berryhill
| Hung T. Trinh |
| Acting Commissioner Nancy A. Berryhill and Nancy A. Berryhill |
| 5:2019cv00904 |
| May 14, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Frederick F Mumm |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 12, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 NOTICE TO COUNSEL: ALL PARTIES having consented to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge, this case has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm for all further proceedings. Please use the case number EDCV19-904 FFM on all documents subsequently filed to ensure the proper routing of all filings. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. TEXT ONLY ENTRY. (sn) |
| Filing 14 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Nancy A. Berryhill. (Attorney Lara A Bradt added to party Nancy A. Berryhill(pty:dft))(Bradt, Lara) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Plaintiff Hung T. Trinh. correcting Consent to Proceed before U S Magistrate Judge (non-AUSA) - Non-Final #11 (Krank, Laura) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Consent to Proceed before U S Magistrate Judge (non-AUSA) - Non-Final #11 . The following error(s) was/were found: Case number is incorrect or missing. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (sn) |
| Filing 11 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Plaintiff Hung T. Trinh. (Krank, Laura) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Hung T. Trinh, upon Defendant Nancy A. Berryhill served on 6/6/2019, answer due 8/5/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were Service was executed in compliance with statute not specified. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt NOT attached. Original Summons NOT returned. (Krank, Laura) |
Filing 9
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER (Social Security Case) by Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm. (see document for details) (hr)
|
| Filing 8 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Nancy A. Berryhill. (hr) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm: granting #5 REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60). (hr)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and referred to Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm. (et) |
| Filing 5 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Hung T. Trinh. (Krank, Laura) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Hung T. Trinh, (Krank, Laura) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Hung T. Trinh. (Krank, Laura) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Hung T. Trinh. (Krank, Laura) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with In Forma Pauperis request, filed by Plaintiff Hung T. Trinh. (Attorney Laura E Krank added to party Hung T. Trinh(pty:pla))(Krank, Laura) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
