Kenneth Carlos Carreon v. Nancy A. Berryhill
| Kenneth Carlos Carreon |
| Commissioner Social Security and Nancy A. Berryhill |
| 5:2019cv00939 |
| May 20, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Maria A Audero |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 NOTICE TO COUNSEL: ALL PARTIES having consented to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge, this case has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero for all further proceedings. Please use the case number CV19-939 DMG on all documents subsequently filed to ensure the proper routing of all filings. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. TEXT ONLY ENTRY. (sn) |
| Filing 13 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Nancy A. Berryhill. (Attorney In Seon Jeong added to party Nancy A. Berryhill(pty:dft))(Jeong, In) |
| Filing 12 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), (Rohlfing, Lawrence) |
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Kenneth Carlos Carreon, upon Defendant Nancy A. Berryhill served on 6/12/2019, answer due 10/10/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. Original Summons NOT returned. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Rohlfing, Lawrence) |
Filing 10
ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 19-03. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Dean D. Pregerson to Judge Dolly M. Gee for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 5:19-cv-00939 DMG(MAA). (rn)
|
|
Filing 9
INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER REGARDING PROCEDURES IN SOCIAL SECURITY APPEALS by Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. Plaintiff shall serve the summons and complaint on the government promptly in accordance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 4(i) and 20 C.F.R. 423.1. Plaintiff shall file an appropriate proof of service within thirty (30) days after the date of this Order. (See document for details.) (sbou)
|
| Filing 8 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Nancy A. Berryhill. (sbou) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero: granting #3 REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60). (sbou)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dean D. Pregerson and referred to Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. (esa) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Kenneth Carlos Carreon, (Rohlfing, Lawrence) |
| Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Kenneth Carlos Carreon. (Rohlfing, Lawrence) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Kenneth Carlos Carreon. (Rohlfing, Lawrence) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Kenneth Carlos Carreon. (Rohlfing, Lawrence) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with In Forma Pauperis request, filed by Plaintiff Kenneth Carlos Carreon. (Attorney Lawrence D Rohlfing added to party Kenneth Carlos Carreon(pty:pla))(Rohlfing, Lawrence) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
