Candy Houle v. Billy P. Cannon et al
| CANDY HOULE and Mark Houle |
| Billy P. Cannon, Jr. |
| 5:2019cv01003 |
| May 31, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1109 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 31, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Marc S Schechter counsel for Plaintiffs CANDY HOULE, Mark Houle. Adding Marc S. Schechter as counsel of record for Candy Houle and Mark Houle for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiffs Candy Houle and Mark Houle. (Attorney Marc S Schechter added to party CANDY HOULE(pty:pla), Attorney Marc S Schechter added to party Mark Houle(pty:pla))(Schechter, Marc) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiffs CANDY HOULE, Mark Houle. (Schechter, Corey) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs CANDY HOULE, Mark Houle, identifying None. (Schechter, Corey) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs CANDY HOULE, Mark Houle. (Schechter, Corey) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-23838827 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiffs CANDY HOULE, Mark Houle. (Attorney Corey Francis Schechter added to party CANDY HOULE(pty:pla), Attorney Corey Francis Schechter added to party Mark Houle(pty:pla))(Schechter, Corey) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
