Tomas Duran v. Nancy A. Berryhill
Tomas Duran |
Nancy A. Berryhill |
5:2019cv01060 |
June 10, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Shashi H Kewalramani |
Otis D Wright |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 NOTICE TO COUNSEL: ALL PARTIES having consented to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge, this case has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani for all further proceedings. Please use the case number EDCV19-1060 SHK on all documents subsequently filed to ensure the proper routing of all filings. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. TEXT ONLY ENTRY. (sn) |
Filing 12 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Nancy A. Berryhill. (Attorney Paul H Sachelari added to party Nancy A. Berryhill(pty:dft))(Sachelari, Paul) |
Filing 11 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), (Perales, Monica) |
Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Tomas Duran, upon Defendant Nancy A. Berryhill served on 6/26/2019, answer due 10/24/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. Original Summons NOT returned. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Perales, Monica) |
![]() |
Filing 8 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Nancy A. Berryhill. (dc) |
![]() |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and referred to Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. (lh) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Tomas Duran, (Perales, Monica) |
Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Tomas Duran. (Perales, Monica) |
Filing 3 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Tomas Duran. (Perales, Monica) |
Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Tomas Duran. (Perales, Monica) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with In Forma Pauperis request, filed by Plaintiff Tomas Duran. (Attorney Monica Perales added to party Tomas Duran (pty:pla))(Perales, Monica) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Tomas Duran v. Nancy A. Berryhill | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Tomas Duran | |
Represented By: | Monica Perales |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill | |
Represented By: | Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA |
Represented By: | Assistant US Attorney LA-CV |
Represented By: | Paul H Sachelari |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.