Evani Escobar Mira v. Kevin McAleena et al
| Evani Escobar-Mira |
| Thomas Giles, Kevin McAleenan, William Pelham Barr and James Janecka |
| 5:2019cv01087 |
| June 13, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Maria A Audero |
| John A Kronstadt |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (mj) filed by Respondents William Pelham Barr, Thomas Giles, James Janecka, Kevin McAleenan. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Anthony Santana) (Kollitz, Aaron) |
| Filing 7 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Petitioner Evani Escobar-Mira. (Fontes, Martin) |
| Filing 6 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Aaron Kollitz counsel for Respondents William Pelham Barr, Thomas Giles, James Janecka, Kevin McAleenan. Adding Aaron Kollitz as counsel of record for Respondents for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Respondents Aaron Kollitz. (Attorney Aaron Kollitz added to party William Pelham Barr(pty:res), Attorney Aaron Kollitz added to party Thomas Giles(pty:res), Attorney Aaron Kollitz added to party James Janecka(pty:res), Attorney Aaron Kollitz added to party Kevin McAleenan(pty:res))(Kollitz, Aaron) |
Filing 5
ORDER (1) GRANTING REQUEST FOR ORDER (ECF NO. #4 ) AND (2) REQUIRING RESPONSE TO PETITION by Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. Petitioner's request is GRANTED insofar as the Court hereby orders Respondents to file a response to the Petition. Respondents may file a Motion to Dismiss within thirty (30) days after the date of this Order. If Respondents do not contend that the Petition can be decided without the Court reaching the merits of Petitioner's claims, Respondents may file and serve an Answer to the Petition within forty-five (45) days after the date of this Order. (See document for details.) (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1, #2 Attachment 2) (sbou)
|
| Filing 4 First REQUEST for Order to Show Cause re: habeas petition filed by plaintiff Evani Escobar-Mira. (Fontes, Martin) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus #1 . The following error(s) was found: Attachments # 1 Civil Case Cover Sheet should not have been attached to Docket Entry No.1 Each document should have been filed separately. You are not required to take any action to correct this deficiency unless the Court so directs (et) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge John A. Kronstadt and referred to Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (et) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in Federal Custody (28 USC 2241), Receipt No. 0973-23911746 for $5 filing fee, filed by PLAINTIFF Evani Escobar Mira. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet CV-71, #2 Affidavit Petition for a Writ of Habeas) (Attorney Martin Cayetano Fontes added to party Evani Escobar Mira(pty:bkmov))(Fontes, Martin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
