David Sabino Quair, III v. CDCR et al
David S Quair, III and Diva Moonchild Quair |
CSP Inst. Classification Comm, Flot, Sergeant Franklin, Captain Gilman, T. Alanis, Lieutenant Perades, CDCR and CIM Inst. Classification Comm |
5:2019cv01149 |
June 21, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Philip S Gutierrez |
Autumn D Spaeth |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 NOTICE OF DISCREPANCY AND ORDER: by Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth, ORDERING Notice of Submission of Voluminous Exhibits/Documents by Mail submitted by Plaintiff (11 pages) submitted by Plaintiff David S Quair, III received on 8/13/2019 is not to be filed but instead rejected. Denial based on: It is unclear what relief is being sought by Plaintiff. (et) |
Filing 9 NOTICE OF DISCREPANCY AND ORDER: by Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth, ORDERING Notice of Submission of Voluminous Exhibits/Documents by Mail submitted by Plaintiff (30 pages) submitted by Plaintiff David S Quair, III received on 7/22/2019 is not to be filed but instead rejected. Denial based on: It is unclear what relief is being sought by Plaintiff. (et) |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF DISCREPANCY AND ORDER: by Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth, ORDERING Notice of Submission of Voluminous Exhibits/Documents by Mail submitted by Plaintiff (7 pages) submitted by Plaintiff David S Quair, III received on 7/19/2019 is not to be filed but instead rejected. Denial based on: It is unclear what relief is being sought by Plaintiff. (et) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Submission of Voluminous Exhibits/Documents by Mail filed by Plaintiff David S Quair, III.(kh) |
Filing 6 ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. Plaintiff is ordered to file one consolidated complaint in Case No. 5:18-cv-2595 PSG (ADS) by no later than thirty (30) days from the date of this order. The Clerk of Court is directed to close all of the above-captioned cases except for Case No. 5:18-cv-2595 PSG (ADS) upon the filing of a Consolidated Complaint. (see document for further details) (hr) |
Filing 5 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth granting #3 REQUEST for Leave to Proceed without Prepayment of Filing Fee. It is further ORDERED that the prisoner-plaintiff owes the Court the initial filing fee of $350.00. An initial partial filing fee of $3.00 must be paid within 30 days of the date of this order. Thereafter, monthly payments shall be forwarded to the Court in accordance with this order. (kh) |
RECOMMENDATION issued by Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth re Complaint (Prisoner Civil Rights) #1 . Proposed Order forwarded to the District Judge for approval.(kh) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Philip S. Gutierrez and referred to Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (lh) |
Filing 3 REQUEST to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff David S Quair, III. (lh) |
Filing 2 ELECTION REGARDING CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Plaintiff David S Quair, III. (lh) |
Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed against Defendants T. Alanis, CDCR, CIM Inst. Classification Comm, CSP Inst. Classification Comm, Flot, Franklin, Gilman, Perades pursuant to 42:1983. Case assigned to Judge Philip S. Gutierrez and referred to Magistrate Judge Autumm D. Spaeth. Filed by Plaintiff David S Quair, III. (lh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.