H.D. Smith, LLC v. Domel Inc.
| HD Smith and H.D. Smith, LLC |
| DOMEL, INC., Domel Inc. and Domel Inc. a California corporation doing business as Sail Drug |
| 5:2019cv01150 |
| June 21, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dolly M Gee |
| John E McDermott |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Dolly M. Gee. On August 15, 2019, the clerk entered default as to Defendant #12 . The Order to Show Cause dated August 1, 2019 #10 is hereby discharged. Plaintiff shall move for default judgment within 30 days of this order. IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (kti) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 12 DEFAULT BY CLERK F.R.Civ.P.55(a) as to Domel Inc., d/b/a Sail Drug. (gk) |
| Filing 11 First REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against Defendant Domel Inc. filed by Plaintiff H.D. Smith, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of John K. Ly in Support of Plaintiff H.D. Smith, LLC's Request to Enter Default Against Defendant Domel, Inc., d/b/a Sail Drug) (Ly, John) |
|
Filing 10
MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Dolly M. Gee: The Court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing on or before 8/15/2019 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. As an alternative to a written response by plaintiff(s), the Court will consider the filing of one of the following, as an appropriate response to this Order To Show Cause, on or before the above date, as evidence that the matter is being prosecuted diligently: An answer by the defendant(s); or, Plaintiff's application for entry of default pursuant to Rule 55a of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of a responsive pleading or motion on or before the date upon which a response by plaintiff(s) is due. This action will be dismissed if the above-mentioned document(s) are not filed by the date indicated above. Court Reporter: Not Reported. (gk)
|
| Filing 9 SERVICE UNDER FRCP 5(b)(2)(D) Executed by Plaintiff H.D. Smith, LLC, upon Defendant All Defendants. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the Clerks Office in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Ly, John) |
|
Filing 8
INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dolly M. Gee. (kti)
|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Domel Inc. (lh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dolly M. Gee and Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. (lh) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 HD Smith. (Ly, John) |
| Filing 3 DISCLOSURE re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 PLAINTIFFS DISCLOSURE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO RULE 7.1. filed by Plaintiff HD Smith (Ly, John) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff HD Smith. (Ly, John) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-23961846 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff HD Smith. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B) (Attorney John K Ly added to party HD Smith(pty:pla))(Ly, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
