RAC Development Inc. v. Carlos Chavez et al
| RAC Development Inc. |
| Carlos Chavez and Does 1 thru 10 |
| 5:2019cv01173 |
| June 26, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jacqueline Chooljian |
| James V Selna |
| Real Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT of Eastern Division Removal Case. This case was initially assigned to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and referred to Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian for discovery. Pursuant to General Order 19-03, this case has been randomly reassigned to District Judge James V. Selna. The case number on all documents filed with the Court in this case should read as follows: 5:19-cv-1173-JVS(JCx). (ghap) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Carlos Chavez. (ghap) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Riverside, case number MVC1902042 with CONFORMED FILED copy of summons and complaint.Case assigned to Judge James V. Selna, Discovery to Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. Filing fee $400: PAID, filed by defendant Carlos Chavez. (Attachments: #1 CV-71) (ghap) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
