Ironshore Specialty Insurance Company v. Matich Corporation, et al
| IRONSHORE SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, an Arizona corporation and Ironshore Specialty Insurance Company |
| MATICH CORPORATION, a California Corporation, Does 1 through 20, inclusive and Matich Corporation |
| 5:2019cv01237 |
| July 3, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jesus G Bernal |
| Sheri Pym |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Association of Counsel associating attorney EDWARD J. RIFFLE and JUSTIN D. WITZMANN on behalf of Plaintiff Ironshore Specialty Insurance Company. Filed by Plaintiff Ironshore Specialty Insurance Company (Witzmann, Justin) |
| Filing 11 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Justin D Witzmann counsel for Plaintiff Ironshore Specialty Insurance Company. Adding JUSTIN D. WITZMANN as counsel of record for IRONSHORE SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, an Arizona Corporation for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by PLAINTIFF IRONSHORE SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY. (Attorney Justin D Witzmann added to party Ironshore Specialty Insurance Company(pty:pla))(Witzmann, Justin) |
| Filing 10 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Edward J Riffle counsel for Plaintiff Ironshore Specialty Insurance Company. Adding Edward J. Riffle as counsel of record for Ironshore Specialty Insurance Company for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff Ironshore Specialty Insurance Company. (Attorney Edward J Riffle added to party Ironshore Specialty Insurance Company(pty:pla))(Riffle, Edward) |
Filing 9
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Jesus G. Bernal. (ima)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): Civil Cover Sheet and Request to issue Summons incorrectly filed and entered as Complaint. Each of these documents should have been filed under its correct/event relief. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (esa) |
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant Matich Corporation. (esa) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. (esa) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Ironshore Specialty Insurance Company, (Buzzard, Erik) |
| Filing 3 * REQUEST TO ISSUE SUMMONS * filed as COMPLAINT with filing fee previously paid (400 paid on 07/03/2019, receipt number 0973-24028265), filed by Plaintiff IRONSHORE SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, an Arizona corporation.(Buzzard, Erik) Modified on 7/5/2019 (esa). |
| Filing 2 * CIVIL COVER SHEET * filed as COMPLAINT with filing fee previously paid (400 paid on 07/03/2019, receipt number 0973-24028265), filed by Plaintiff IRONSHORE SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, an Arizona corporation.(Buzzard, Erik) Modified on 7/5/2019 (esa). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24028265 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff IRONSHORE SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, an Arizona corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibts A through B) (Attorney Erik Dean Buzzard added to party IRONSHORE SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, an Arizona corporation(pty:pla))(Buzzard, Erik) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
