Daniel Lopez v. Vahi, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Daniel Lopez
Defendant: Does 1-10 and Vahi, Inc.
Case Number: 5:2019cv01271
Filed: July 11, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Jesus G Bernal
Referring Judge: Kenly Kiya Kato
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 21, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Jesus G. Bernal. Scheduling Conference set for 10/7/2019 at 11:00 AM before Judge Jesus G. Bernal. (iva)
August 7, 2019 Filing 11 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Vahi, Inc., identifying Valley-Hi Toyota. (Rheinheimer, Jane)
August 7, 2019 Filing 10 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant Vahi, Inc..(Attorney Jane A Rheinheimer added to party Vahi, Inc.(pty:dft))(Rheinheimer, Jane)
July 31, 2019 Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Daniel Lopez, upon Defendant Vahi, Inc. served on 7/26/2019, answer due 8/16/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon KENT C BROWNING in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell)
July 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Jesus G. Bernal. (ima)
July 11, 2019 Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Vahi, Inc. (et)
July 11, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et)
July 11, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. (et)
July 11, 2019 Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Daniel Lopez. (Handy, Russell)
July 11, 2019 Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Daniel Lopez, (Handy, Russell)
July 11, 2019 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Daniel Lopez. (Handy, Russell)
July 11, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24064144 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Daniel Lopez. (Attorney Russell C Handy added to party Daniel Lopez(pty:pla))(Handy, Russell)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Daniel Lopez v. Vahi, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Vahi, Inc.
Represented By: Suzanne L Smigliani
Represented By: Jane A Rheinheimer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Daniel Lopez
Represented By: Raymond George Ballister, Jr
Represented By: Phyl Grace
Represented By: Dennis Jay Price, II
Represented By: Russell C Handy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?