Erika Ambrose v. Skyline Security Management, Inc.
Plaintiff: ERIKA AMBROSE
Defendant: Skyline Security Management, Inc.
Case Number: 5:2019cv01316
Filed: July 17, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Sheri Pym
Referring Judge: Stephen V Wilson
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 13, 2019 Filing 14 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal Erika Ambrose. (Bontrager, Nicholas)
August 13, 2019 Filing 13 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Skyline Security Management, Inc., (Brody, Lori)
August 13, 2019 Filing 12 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Skyline Security Management, Inc. answer now due 9/27/2019, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Skyline Security Management, Inc..(Attorney Lori S Brody added to party Skyline Security Management, Inc.(pty:dft))(Brody, Lori)
July 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 11 NEW CASE ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (pc)
July 22, 2019 Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Skyline Security Management, Inc.. (yl)
July 18, 2019 Filing 9 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Errata #5 Erika Ambrose. (Martin, George)
July 18, 2019 Filing 8 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #2 . The following error(s) was found: Counsel has e-filed a Notice of Errata correcting the Complaint in this case. Please e-file a new Request for Clerk to Issue Summons regarding the corrected complaint. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (car)
July 18, 2019 Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car)
July 18, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stephen V. Wilson and Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. (car)
July 17, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Plaintiff ERIKA AMBROSE. correcting Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Exhibit A Re: Complaint)(Martin, George)
July 17, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties (Martin, George)
July 17, 2019 Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff ERIKA AMBROSE. (Martin, George)
July 17, 2019 Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 ERIKA AMBROSE. (Martin, George)
July 17, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24102843 - Fee: $400. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Attorney George Thomas Martin, III added to party ERIKA AMBROSE(pty:pla))(Martin, George)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Erika Ambrose v. Skyline Security Management, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ERIKA AMBROSE
Represented By: George Thomas Martin, III
Represented By: Nicholas J Bontrager
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Skyline Security Management, Inc.
Represented By: Keith J Wesley
Represented By: Lori S Brody
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?