Erika Booth v. Regional Adjustment Bureau, Inc.
Plaintiff: Erika Booth
Defendant: Regional Adjustment Bureau, Inc., RAB, Inc. and Regional Adjustment Bureau, Inc. doing business as RAB Inc.
Case Number: 5:2019cv01328
Filed: July 19, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Kenly Kiya Kato
Referring Judge: George H Wu
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 13, 2019 Filing 18 21 DAY Summons Issued re Amended Complaint/Petition #16 as to Defendant RAB, Inc.. (yl)
September 4, 2019 Filing 17 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint/Petition #16 filed by Plaintiff Erika Booth. (Sulaiman, Omar)
September 4, 2019 Filing 16 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendant RAB, Inc. amending Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , filed by Plaintiff Erika Booth(Sulaiman, Omar)
September 3, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 15 MINUTES: IN CHAMBERS-ORDER by Judge George H. Wu: Plaintiff's Motion to Substitute Defendant and to File an Amended Complaint #14 is currently on calendar for September 5. Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 7-15, the Court finds that this matter is appropriate for decision without oral argument. Plaintiffs Motion is GRANTED. Plaintiff will file her amended complaint forthwith. granting #14 MOTION to Substitute Party. (yl)
August 7, 2019 Filing 14 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Substitute Defendant RAB, Inc. for Defendant Regional Adjustment Bureau, Inc. d/b/a RAB Inc. and to File an Amended Complaint filed by Plaintiff Erika Booth. Motion set for hearing on 9/5/2019 at 08:30 AM before Judge George H. Wu. (Attachments: #1 Amended Complaint, #2 Proposed Order) (Sulaiman, Omar)
August 6, 2019 Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Erika Booth, upon Defendant Regional Adjustment Bureau, Inc. served on 8/5/2019, answer due 8/26/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Jeffrey Snyderman, Who is Designated by Law to Accept Service of Process on Defendant's Behalf in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Wajda, Nicholas)
July 31, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 12 Standing Order Re Final Pre-Trial Conferences for Civil Jury Trials Before Judge George H. Wu by Judge George H. Wu. (See document for details) (mrgo)
July 29, 2019 Filing 11 ALIAS SUMMONS issued as to Defendant Regional Adjustment Bureau, Inc. (mrgo)
July 26, 2019 Filing 10 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Erika Booth. (Wajda, Nicholas)
July 25, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER by Judge George H. Wu: granting #8 Non-Resident Attorney Omar Tayseer Sulaiman APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of plaintiff Erika Booth, designating Nicholas M. Wajda as local counsel. (mrgo)
July 23, 2019 Filing 8 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Omar Tayseer Sulaiman to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Erika Booth (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-24133381) filed by Plaintiff Erika Booth. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Wajda, Nicholas)
July 22, 2019 Filing 7 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant Regional Adjustment Bureau, Inc. (esa)
July 22, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa)
July 22, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge George H. Wu and Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. (esa)
July 19, 2019 Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Erika Booth. (Wajda, Nicholas)
July 19, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Erika Booth, (Wajda, Nicholas)
July 19, 2019 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Erika Booth. (Wajda, Nicholas)
July 19, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24111768 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Erika Booth. (Attorney Nicholas M Wajda added to party Erika Booth(pty:pla))(Wajda, Nicholas)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Erika Booth v. Regional Adjustment Bureau, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Regional Adjustment Bureau, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: RAB, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Regional Adjustment Bureau, Inc. doing business as RAB Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Erika Booth
Represented By: Nicholas M Wajda
Represented By: Omar T Sulaiman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?