David Sabino Quair III v. California Dept of Corr. and Rehab. et al
| David Sabino Quair, III |
| IGI Unit CSP Calif Inst for Men, California Dept of Corr. and Rehab., California Correctional Peace Officers - San Quentin, Calif. Corr. Peace Officers of CIM, Director of Corrections, Peace Officers of Calif. and IGI Unit CSP San Quentin |
| 5:2019cv01397 |
| July 30, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Philip S Gutierrez |
| Autumn D Spaeth |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL by Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth: Plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel #4 is DENIED without prejudice. (kh)
|
| Filing 16 EXHIBIT Filed filed by Plaintiff David Sabino Quair, III. (kh) |
| Filing 15 EXHIBIT Filed filed by Plaintiff David Sabino Quair, III. (kh) |
| Filing 14 EXHIBITS Filed filed by Plaintiff David Sabino Quair, III. (kh) |
| Filing 13 EXHIBIT Filed filed by Plaintiff David Sabino Quair, III. (kh) |
| Filing 12 EXHIBITS Filed filed by Plaintiff David Sabino Quair, III. (kh) |
| Filing 9 EXHIBIT Filed filed by Plaintiff David Sabino Quair, III. (kh) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Submission of Voluminous Exhibits/Documents by Mail filed by Plaintiff David Sabino Quair, III.(kh) |
|
Filing 7
NOTICE OF DISCREPANCY AND ORDER: by Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth, ORDERING Notice of Submission of Voluminous Exhibits/Documents by Mail submitted by Plaintiff (11 pages) submitted by Plaintiff David Sabino Quair, III received on 8/13/2019 is not to be filed but instead rejected. Denial based on: It is unclear what relief is being sought by Plaintiff. (et)
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Submission of Voluminous Exhibits/Documents by Mail filed by Plaintiff David Sabino Quair, III.(kh) |
|
Filing 6
NOTICE OF DISCREPANCY AND ORDER: by Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth, ORDERING Notice of Submission of Voluminous Exhibits/Documents by Mail submitted by plaintiff (29 pages) submitted by Plaintiff David Sabino Quair, III received on 8/5/19 is not to be filed but instead rejected. Denial based on: It is unclear what relief is being sought by Plaintiff. (twdb)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Philip S. Gutierrez and referred to Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth. (esa) |
| Filing 4 EX PARTE APPLICATION for Appointment of Counsel; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES; DECLARATION filed by plaintiff David Sabino Quair, III. (esa) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support filed by plaintiff David Sabino Quair, III. (esa) |
| Filing 2 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by plaintiff David Sabino Quair, III. (esa) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed against defendants Calif. Corr. Peace Officers of CIM, California Correctional Peace Officers - San Quentin, California Dept of Corr. and Rehab., Director of Corrections, IGI Unit CSP Calif Inst for Men, IGI Unit CSP San Quentin, Peace Officers of Calif. pursuant to 42 USC 1983pr. Case assigned to Judge Philip S. Gutierrez and referred to Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth, filed by plaintiff David Sabino Quair, III. (esa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
