Sotero Gutierrez-Ponce v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Sotero Ponce-Gutierrez and Sotero Gutierrez-Ponce
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 5:2019cv01429
Filed: August 1, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Cormac J Carney
Referring Judge: Michael R Wilner
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 16, 2019 Filing 9 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Commissioner of Social Security. (Attorney In Seon Jeong added to party Commissioner of Social Security(pty:dft))(Jeong, In)
September 10, 2019 Filing 8 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Sotero Gutierrez-Ponce, upon Defendant Commissioner of Social Security served on 8/19/2019, answer due 10/18/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. Original Summons NOT returned. (Attachments: #1 certified mail receipt)(Lee, Shanny)
August 5, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE: PROCEDURES IN SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL (JOINT SUBMISSION FORMAT Updated 7/8/2019) by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (See Minute Order for details) (vm)
August 2, 2019 Filing 6 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Commissioner of Social Security. (lh)
August 2, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Cormac J. Carney and referred to Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (lh)
August 1, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties (Lee, Shanny)
August 1, 2019 Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 Sotero Ponce-Gutierrez. (Lee, Shanny)
August 1, 2019 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Sotero Ponce-Gutierrez. (Lee, Shanny)
August 1, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24187662 - Fee: $400. (Attorney Shanny J Lee added to party Sotero Ponce-Gutierrez(pty:pla))(Lee, Shanny)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sotero Gutierrez-Ponce v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: In Seon Jeong
Represented By: Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA
Represented By: Assistant US Attorney LA-CV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sotero Ponce-Gutierrez
Represented By: Shanny J Lee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sotero Gutierrez-Ponce
Represented By: Shanny J Lee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?