In re Brigitte Lyn LaMonte
| Brigitte Lyn LaMonte |
| Rod Danielson and San Bernardino County Treasurer-Tax Collector |
| 5:2019cv01447 |
| August 5, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Michael W Fitzgerald |
| Bankruptcy Appeal (801) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 0158 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE REGARDING APPEAL FROM BANKRUPTCY COURT. The appeal has been assigned to Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. Refer to the Notice for specifics. (esa) |
| Filing 4 U.S. Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Ninth Circuit Notice of Transfer of Appeal to District Court; Acknowledgment of Receipt by District Court dated 8/5/19. (esa) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF REFERRAL OF APPEAL to Bankruptcy Appellate Panel prepared by the United States Bankruptcy Court on 7/11/19. (esa) |
| Filing 2 STATEMENT RE: ELECTION TO TRANSFER APPEAL TO DISTRICT COURT filed by Appellee Rod Danielson. (esa) |
Filing 1
NOTICE OF APPEAL AND STATEMENT OF ELECTION Re: Dismissal Order entered on 6/26/19 by Bankruptcy Judge Wayne E Johnson, filed in the Bankruptcy Court on 7/10/19. Bankruptcy Court case number: 6:19-bk-14124-WJ, Adversary number: NA, BAP case number: cc-19-1169., filed by appellant Brigitte Lyn LaMonte. (Attachments: #1 BAP Dkt) (esa) Modified on 8/6/2019 (esa).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
