Gurjit Singh v. U.S. Department Homeland Security et al
| Gurjit Singh |
| William Barr, U.S. Department Homeland Security, U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement and Timothy S. Robbins |
| 5:2019cv01461 |
| August 6, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Kenly Kiya Kato |
| Virginia A Phillips |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO PETITION by Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato: re Stipulation for Order, #10 . (dts)
|
| Filing 10 STIPULATION for Order EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO PETITION; AND DECLARATION OF ALARICE M. MEDRANO filed by Respondents William Barr, Timothy S. Robbins, U.S. Department Homeland Security, U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Medrano, Alarice) |
|
Filing 9
STANDING ORDER by Judge Virginia A. Phillips. (bh)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER GRANTING TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER by Judge Virginia A. Phillips that Petitioner's request for a temporary restraining order is GRANTED and Respondents are enjoined from removing Petitioner from the United States until further order of this Court. Pursuant to the Order Requiring Response to Petition, dkt. #3 . Respondents may file a Motion to Dismiss on or before 9/11/2019 or their Answer to the Petition by 9/26/2019. (jp)
|
|
Order Presented By (TRO) Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato Re Petition #1 . Proposed Order forwarded to the District Judge Phillips for review and approval.(jlo)
|
| Filing 7 RESPONSE filed by Respondents William Barr, Timothy S. Robbins, U.S. Department Homeland Security, U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcementto Order to Show Cause,, Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings, #4 AND OPPOSITION TO PETITIONER'S REQUEST FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER (Medrano, Alarice) |
| Filing 6 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Alarice M Medrano counsel for Respondents William Barr, Timothy S. Robbins, U.S. Department Homeland Security, U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement. Adding Alarice M. Medrano as counsel of record for U.S. DHS; U.S. ICE; Timothy S. Robbins; and William Barr for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Federal Defendants U.S. DHS; U.S. ICE; Timothy S. Robbins and William Barr. (Attorney Alarice M Medrano added to party William Barr(pty:res), Attorney Alarice M Medrano added to party Timothy S. Robbins(pty:res), Attorney Alarice M Medrano added to party U.S. Department Homeland Security(pty:res), Attorney Alarice M Medrano added to party U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement(pty:res))(Medrano, Alarice) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: Due to clerical error the Case has been reassigned from Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth to Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato for all further proceedings. The case will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 5:19-cv-01461 VAP(KKx). (rn) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY TEMPORARY RETRAINING ORDER SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED by Judge Virginia A. Phillips: Respondents were served with a copy of the Petition on August 12, 2019, (Doc. No. 3), but have yet to respond. The Court therefore ORDERS Respondents to SHOW CAUSE IN WRITING, no later than August 21, 2019, why Petitioner's request for a temporary restraining order, pending resolution of the Petition, should not be granted. (see document for further details) (bm)
|
| RECOMMENDATION issued by Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth re Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Emergency Temporary Restraining Order #1 . Proposed Order forwarded to the District Judge for approval. (kh) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER REQUIRING RESPONSE TO PETITION by Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth: Respondents shall e-file and serve a Notice of Appearance that designates the Assistant United States Attorney(s) in charge of the case within fourteen (14) days of the service date of this Order. Respondents shall file a Motion to Dismiss within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. Respondents shall file and serve an Answer to the Petition within forty-five (45) days of the date of this Order. Petitioner may file a single Reply responding to matters raised in the Answer within twenty (20) days of the date of service of the Answer. Notice: The court has issued a ruling on preliminary review. Pursuant to the Agreement on Acceptance of Service between the Clerk of Court and the United States Attorneys Office, this Notice constitutes service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. (Attachments: #1 Petition, #2 Exhibit to Petition, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Blank Consent) (kh)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Virginia A. Phillips and referred to Magistrate Judge Autumn D. Spaeth, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (jtil) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS with filing fee previously paid ($5.00 paid on 08/06/2019, receipt number 0973-24216896), filed by Petitioner Gurjit Singh. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Attorney Rose Marie Thompson added to party Gurjit Singh(pty:pet))(Thompson, Rose) |
| FILING FEE PAID for new civil case. Receipt No. 0973-24216896 for $5 filing fee. (Thompson, Rose) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
