John Howe v. Kohls Department Stores, Inc.
| John Howe |
| Kohl's Department Stores, Inc., Kohls Department Stores, Inc. and Does 1 through 50, inclusive |
| Roes 1-20, inclusive and Roes |
| 5:2019cv01485 |
| August 9, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Sheri Pym |
| Josephine L Staton |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER CONTINUING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND ORDERING COUNSEL TO REVIEW LOCAL PROCEDURES by Judge Josephine L. Staton: Accordingly, no later than October 18, 2019, counsel shall file an Amended Joint Rule 26(f) Report with a fully completed Exhibit A. The Court CONTINUES the Scheduling Conference to November 1, 2019, at 10:30 a.m. (see document for further details) (bm)
|
| Filing 9 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 3-5 days, filed by Defendant Kohls Department Stores, Inc... (Prouty, Tanya) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Josephine L. Staton. Scheduling Conference is set for 10/4/2019 at 10:30 a.m. See document for details. (tg)
|
| Filing 7 INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON. (tg) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant and Cross-Complainant Kohls Department Stores, Inc., Kohls Department Stores, Inc., re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 served on August 13, 2019. (Prouty, Tanya) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT of Eastern Division Removal Case. This case was initially assigned to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and referred to Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym for discovery. Pursuant to General Order 19-03, this case has been randomly reassigned to District Judge Josephine L. Staton. The case number on all documents filed with the Court in this case should read as follows: 5:19-cv-01485 JLS (SPx). (car) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1 to 50, inclusive, Kohls Department Stores, Inc. Jury Demanded, filed by plaintiff John Howe. Filed in State Court on 5/2/19 Submitted with Exhibit A to Notice of Removal #1 (car) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER TO UNVERIFIED FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL, filed by Defendant Kohls Department Stores, Inc. Filed in State Court on 7/1/19 Submitted with Exhibit B to Notice of Removal #1 .(car) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF CROSS COMPLAINT against Cross Defendant Roes 1-20, Inclusive, filed by Defendant and Cross Claimant Kohls Department Stores, Inc. Filed in State Court on 7/1/19 Submitted with Attachment C to Notice of Removal #1 . (car) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant and Cross-Complaint Kohl's Department Stores, Inc., Kohl's Department Stores, Inc., identifying John Howe and Kohl's Department Stores, Inc.. (Prouty, Tanya) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Cross Claimant Kohl's Department Stores, Inc., Defendant Kohl's Department Stores, Inc.. (Prouty, Tanya) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from San Bernardino Superior Court, case number CIVDS1913951 Receipt No: 0973-24236494 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant and Cross-Complainant Kohl's Department Stores, Inc., Kohl's Department Stores, Inc.. (Attorney Tanya Prouty added to party Kohl's Department Stores, Inc.(pty:crc), Attorney Tanya Prouty added to party Kohl's Department Stores, Inc.(pty:dft))(Prouty, Tanya) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
