Susan Hoskins v. C.R. Bard, Inc.
Susan Hoskins |
C.R. Bard, Inc. |
5:2019cv01486 |
August 9, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Jesus G Bernal |
Shashi H Kewalramani |
Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant C.R. Bard, Inc., identifying Susan Hoskins; C. R. Bard, Inc.; C. R. Bard, Inc. is a wholly owned subsidiary of Becton, Dickinson and Company; and T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. owns 10% or more of Becton, Dickinson and Companys stock.. (Buhr, Eric) |
Filing 17 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant C.R. Bard, Inc. identifying C. R. Bard, Inc. is a wholly owned subsidiary of Becton, Dickinson and Company; and T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. owns 10% or more of Becton, Dickinson and Companys stock. as Corporate Parent. (Buhr, Eric) |
Filing 16 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Amended Complaint/Petition #11 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 7.1-1 No Notice of Interested Parties and/or no copies. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (twdb) |
Filing 15 ANSWER to Amended Complaint/Petition #11 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant C.R. Bard, Inc..(Buhr, Eric) |
Filing 14 21 DAY Summons Issued re First Amended Complaint/Petition #11 as to defendant C.R. Bard, Inc. (twdb) |
Filing 13 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (21 days), #12 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Summons request. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (twdb) |
Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Susan Hoskins, upon Defendant C.R. Bard, Inc. served on 9/9/2019, answer due 10/4/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon C. R. Bard in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. First Amended Summons (Kohls, Daniel) |
Filing 11 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendant C.R. Bard, Inc. amending Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , filed by Plaintiff Susan Hoskins(Kohls, Daniel) |
Filing 10 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to C.R. Bard, Inc. answer now due 10/4/2019, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant C.R. Bard, Inc..(Attorney Eric J Buhr added to party C.R. Bard, Inc.(pty:dft))(Buhr, Eric) |
Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Susan Hoskins, upon Defendant C.R. Bard, Inc. served on 8/14/2019, answer due 9/4/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Sabina Dunning-CR Bard in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Kohls, Daniel) |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 . The following error(s) was found: Attachments # 1 Civil Cover Sheet and Attachment # 2 Summons should not have been attached to Docket Entry No.1 Each document should have been filed separately. You are not required to take any action to correct this deficiency unless the Court so directs (et) |
Filing 5 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant C.R. Bard, Inc. (et) |
Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. (et) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Susan Hoskins, (Kohls, Daniel) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24237170 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Susan Hoskins. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons) (Attorney Daniel Vincent Kohls added to party Susan Hoskins(pty:bkmov))(Kohls, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Susan Hoskins v. C.R. Bard, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Susan Hoskins | |
Represented By: | Daniel Vincent Kohls |
Represented By: | Christine E Jacob |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Marilyn A Moberg |
Represented By: | Eric J Buhr |
Represented By: | Michael Kevin Brown |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.