Holly Wood et al v. Stewart Title Guaranty Company et al
| John Wood and Holly Wood |
| Stewart Title Guaranty Company, Does 1-100 and Stewart Title of Arkansas, LLC |
| 5:2019cv01606 |
| August 23, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dale S Fischer |
| Kenly Kiya Kato |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1) filed by Defendant Stewart Title Guaranty Company.(Wright, William) |
| Filing 9 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Stewart Title Guaranty Company answer now due 9/9/2019, re Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant Stewart Title Guaranty Company.(Wright, William) |
Filing 8
STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dale S. Fischer. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on Court's website under Judge Fischer's Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judge's Requirements tab. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PROVIDE A MANDATORY CHAMBERS COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, AND ANY OTHER INITIATING DOCUMENTS. (rfi)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Miscellaneous Document #3 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): Using wrong events "Miscellaneous Document" The Correct event category is located under Civil Events Other filings and select Notice Other under Notice of Interested Parties. You are not required to take any action to correct this deficiency unless the Court so directs. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT of Eastern Division Removal Case. This case was initially assigned to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and referred to Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato for discovery. Pursuant to General Order 19-03, this case has been randomly reassigned to District Judge Dale S. Fischer. The case number on all documents filed with the Court in this case should read as follows: 5:19-cv-01606-DSF (KKx). (et) |
| Filing 4 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Stewart Title Guaranty Company, re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Miscellaneous Document #3 served on 8/23/19. (Wright, William) |
| NON-CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Stewart Title Guaranty Company, Stewart Title of Arkansas, LLC., Does 1-100, filed by Plaintiffs John Wood, Holly Wood. [SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO EXHIBIT A TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 . (et) |
| Filing 3 Certification and Notice of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Stewart Title Guaranty Company (Wright, William) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Stewart Title Guaranty Company. (Wright, William) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from California County of San Bernardino, case number CIVDS1917650 Receipt No: 0973-24320406 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Stewart Title Guaranty Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A to Notice of Removal, #2 Declaration of Pamela Butler O'Brien in Support of Notice of Removal) (Attorney William A Wright added to party Stewart Title Guaranty Company(pty:dft))(Wright, William) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
