Marlon Rene Bradley v. Foss
| Marlon Rene Bradley |
| Foss |
| 5:2019cv01683 |
| September 4, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Steve Kim |
| Ronald SW Lew |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 JUDGMENT by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew, Related to: Order Dismissing Petition for Lack of Jurisdiction #5 . IT IS ADJUDGED that the petition for writ of habeas corpus and this action are dismissed. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (hr) |
Filing 5
ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION AND DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew. THEREFORE, the Petition is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. Judgment dismissing this action will be entered accordingly. FURTHERMORE, a Certificate of Appealability is DENIED because Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right and that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the Court is correct in its procedural ruling. (SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS). (clee)
|
|
Presented By Order issued by Magistrate Judge Steve Kim Re Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254) #1 forwarded to the District Judge Ronald S.W. Lew for review.(clee)
|
| Filing 4 FINANCIAL ENTRY: Received $5.00 filing fee from Marlon Bradley. Re: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254), #1 . Receipt number LA194817. (ek) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Ronald S.W. Lew and referred to Magistrate Judge Steve Kim, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (Attachments: #1 CV-111 and CV-27) (ghap) |
| Filing 2 ELECTION REGARDING CONSENT to Proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge Declined, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636c filed by Petitioner Marlon Rene Bradley. The Petitioner does not consent. (ghap) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In State Custody (28:2254) Case assigned to Judge Ronald S.W. Lew and referred to Magistrate Judge Steve Kim.(Filing fee $ 5: FEE DUE.), filed by petitioner Marlon Rene Bradley. (Attachments: #1 Part 1 2254, #2 Part 2 2254, #3 Part 3 of 2254, #4 Part 4 of 2254, #5 Part 5 of 2254, #6 Part 6 of 2254) (ghap) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Marlon Rene Bradley v. Foss | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Marlon Rene Bradley | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Foss | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
