Raul Uriarte Limon v. Phil Velto et al
| Raul Uriarte-Limon |
| Does 1-10 and Phil Velto |
| 5:2019cv01721 |
| September 10, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jesus G Bernal |
| Sheri Pym |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Certification and Notice of Interested Parties (LR 7.1-1) #14 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: "Other Filings" - Notices - Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (ad) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE OF INTERESTED PARTIES filed by Defendant Phil Velto. (Anderson, Richard) |
Filing 13
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Jesus G. Bernal. Scheduling Conference set for 12/23/2019 at 11:00 AM before Judge Jesus G. Bernal. (iva)
|
| Filing 12 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS RE: Deficiency in Electronically Filed Documents (G-112A) - optional html form,, #11 by Deputy Clerk of Court. Certification and Notice of Interested Parties to be filed no later than October 23, 2019. (iva) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Answer to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #10 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 7.1-1 No Notice of Interested Parties and/or no copies. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (ad) |
| Filing 10 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 DEFENDANT'S ANSWER TO THE COMPLAINT filed by Defendant Phil Velto.(Attorney Richard G Anderson added to party Phil Velto(pty:dft))(Anderson, Richard) |
| Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Raul Uriarte-Limon, upon Defendant Phil Velto served on 9/25/2019, answer due 10/16/2019. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
|
Filing 8
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Jesus G. Bernal. (ima)
|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Phil Velto. (jtil) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Raul Uriarte-Limon. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Raul Uriarte-Limon, (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Raul Uriarte-Limon. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24406942 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Raul Uriarte-Limon. (Attorney Russell C Handy added to party Raul Uriarte-Limon(pty:pla))(Handy, Russell) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
