Robert A. Cox v. Nancy A. Berryhill
| Robert A. Cox |
| Andrew M. Saul and Nancy A. Berryhill |
| 5:2019cv01757 |
| September 13, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Andre Birotte |
| Jean P Rosenbluth |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Nancy A. Berryhill. (Attorney Jennifer A Kenney added to party Nancy A. Berryhill(pty:dft))(Kenney, Jennifer) |
| Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Robert A. Cox, upon Defendant Nancy A. Berryhill served on 10/10/2019, answer due 12/9/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. Original Summons NOT returned. (Attachments: #1 certified mail receipt, #2 Summons)(Lee, Shanny) |
| Filing 11 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Nancy A. Berryhill. (sbou) |
| Filing 10 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Notice of Deficiency in Request to Issue Summons,, #9 Robert A. Cox. (Lee, Shanny) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #8 . The following error(s) was found: The caption of the summons must match the caption of the complaint verbatim. If the caption is too large to fit in the space provided, enter the name of the first party and then write see attached.Next, attach a face page of the complaint or a second page addendum to the Summons. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (sbou) |
| Filing 8 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Notice of Deficiency in Request to Issue Summons,, #6 Robert A. Cox. (Lee, Shanny) |
Filing 7
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. Plaintiff must electronically file a proof of service showing compliance with this paragraph within 30 days of the date of this order or as soon as service is timely completed. (See document for details.) (sbou)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #3 . The following error(s) was found: The caption of the summons must match the caption of the complaint verbatim. If the caption is too large to fit in the space provided, enter the name of the first party and then write see attached.Next, attach a face page of the complaint or a second page addendum to the Summons. Summons is not directed to the defendant(s). The defendants name must appear in the To:section of the summons. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Andre Birotte Jr and referred to Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties (Lee, Shanny) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 Robert A. Cox. (Lee, Shanny) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Robert A. Cox. (Lee, Shanny) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24434205 - Fee: $400. (Attorney Shanny J Lee added to party Robert A. Cox(pty:pla))(Lee, Shanny) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
