Cynthia Renae McNamara v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Cynthia Renae McNamara |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 5:2019cv01774 |
| September 16, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Valerie Baker Fairbank |
| Alexander F MacKinnon |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Commissioner of Social Security. (Attorney Armand D Roth added to party Commissioner of Social Security(pty:dft))(Roth, Armand) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed Cynthia Renae McNamara, upon Defendant Commissioner of Social Security served on 10/12/2019, answer due 11/12/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to C. Velez. Executed upon the Attorney Generals Office of the United States by unspecified means. Executed upon the officer agency or corporation by delivering a copy to Karim M. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. Original Summons NOT returned. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit)(Alumit, Gregory) |
Filing 9
SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER REGARDING FURTHER PROCEEDINGS by Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. Mandatory chambers copies of e-filed documents shall be delivered to the Magistrate Judge's box located outside the Clerk's Office, 12th Floor, Roybal Federal Building and Courthouse, 255 East Temple Street, Los Angeles, California 90012, within twenty-four hours after e-filing. (See document for details.) (sbou)
|
|
Filing 8
(In Chambers): ORDER RE: PROCEDURES IN SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL upon filing of the complaint by Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. Plaintiff will promptly serve the summons and complaint on the government in accordance with Rule 4(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff will file an appropriate proof of service within 30 days of the date of this Order. Government counsel must file a notice of appearance within 30 days of service of the action. (See document for details.) (sbou)
|
| Filing 7 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Commissioner of Social Security. (sbou) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #3 . The following error(s) was found: Please put for the Central District of California. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank and referred to Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. (ghap) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Cynthia Renae McNamara, (Alumit, Gregory) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Cynthia Renae McNamara. (Alumit, Gregory) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Cynthia Renae McNamara. (Alumit, Gregory) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24447349 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Cynthia Renae McNamara. (Attorney Gregory Alumit added to party Cynthia Renae McNamara(pty:pla))(Alumit, Gregory) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
