Charanjot Singh v. 7-Eleven, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Charanjot Singh
Defendant: 7-Eleven, Inc., Does 1 to 10 inclusive, Tammy Rozga, David James Marks and Joe DePinto
Case Number: 5:2019cv01820
Filed: September 23, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Kenly Kiya Kato
Referring Judge: John F Walter
Nature of Suit: Contract: Franchise
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 14 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION by Judge John F. Walter. The Court hereby DISMISSES this action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (iv)
November 8, 2019 Filing 13 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendant All Defendants amending Complaint - (Discovery), #1 , filed by Plaintiff Charanjot Singh(Singh, Charanjot)
October 31, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 12 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISS FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION by Judge John F. Walter. Plaintiff is hereby ordered to show cause, in writing, no later than November 8, 2019, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (iv)
October 2, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER by Judge John F. Walter: Granting #3 APPLICATION for Pro Se Electronic Filing. The applicant must register to use the Courts CM/ECF System within five (5) days of being served with this order. Registration information is available at the Pro Se Litigant E-Filing web page located on the Courts website. Upon registering, the applicant will receive a CM/ECF login and password that will allow him/her to file non- sealed documents electronically in this case only. Any documents being submitted under seal must be manually filed with the Clerk. (iv)
September 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 SELF-REPRESENTATION ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. (iv)
September 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 STANDING ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge John F. Walter. (iv)
September 26, 2019 Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery), #1 as to defendants 7-Eleven, Inc., Joe DePinto, David James Marks, Tammy Rozga. (dts)
September 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato: granting #4 REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60). (dts)
September 23, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh)
September 23, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John F. Walter and Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. (lh)
September 23, 2019 Filing 4 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Charanjot Singh. (lh)
September 23, 2019 Filing 3 APPLICATION for Pro Se Litigant to electronically file documents in a specific case, filed by Plaintiff Charanjot Singh. (lh)
September 23, 2019 Filing 2 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Charanjot Singh. (lh)
September 23, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendants 7-Eleven, Inc., Joe DePinto, Does 1 to 10, David James Marks, Tammy Rozga. Case assigned to Judge John F. Walter for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Charanjot Singh. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons as to Defendant 7-Eleven, Inc.) (lh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Charanjot Singh v. 7-Eleven, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: 7-Eleven, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 to 10 inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tammy Rozga
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David James Marks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Joe DePinto
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Charanjot Singh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?