Wayne Scissons et al v. Jesus Rodriguez Garcia
| Patricia Scissons and Wayne Scissons |
| Jesus Rodriguez Garcia and Does 1 to 100 |
| 5:2019cv01827 |
| September 24, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| David O Carter |
| Shashi H Kewalramani |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
SCHEDULING ORDER & ORDER RE: PRETRIAL AND TRIAL PROCEDURES by Judge David O. Carter: Discovery cut-off 2/21/2020, Motion cut-off 3/23/2020 @ 8:30 AM, Final Pretrial Conference set for 5/18/2020 @ 8:30 AM before Judge David O. Carter, Jury Trial set for 5/26/2020 @ 8:30 AM before Judge David O. Carter. (dgo)
|
|
Filing 16
ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 3 by Judge David O. Carter. Case ordered to a private mediator based upon a stipulation of the parties or by the court order. ADR Proceeding to be held no later than 3/2/2020. (dgo)
|
| Filing 15 MINUTES OF Scheduling Conference held before Judge David O. Carter: Scheduling Order to be issued. Court Reporter: CourtSmart; Courtroom Deputy: Deborah Lewman; Plaintiff Attorney: David Scott Vassalli; Defendant Attorney: Alan J. Freisleben; Time in Court: :10. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. TEXT ONLY ENTRY. (dgo) |
| Filing 14 MINUTES OF Scheduling Conference held before Judge David O. Carter: Scheduling Conference not held due to Plaintiff's Counsel's unavailability. Scheduling Conference reset for 11/12/2019 @ 8:30 AM before Judge David O. Carter. Court Reporter: CourtSmart; Courtroom Deputy: Deborah Lewman; Defendant Counsel: Alan J. Freisleben; Time in Court: :03. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. TEXT ONLY ENTRY. (dgo) |
| Filing 13 SCHEDULING NOTICE by Judge David O. Carter: The Scheduling Conference previously scheduled for 11/4/2019 @ 8:30 AM has been rescheduled. Scheduling Conference set for 10/28/2019 @ 8:30 AM before Judge David O. Carter. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (dgo) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 12 STATUS REPORT Rule 26(f) Report of the Parties filed by Defendant Jesus Rodriguez Garcia. (Fields, Gary) |
| Filing 11 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Jesus Rodriguez Garcia, re Initial Order upon Filing of Complaint - form only #9 , Initial Order Setting R26 Scheduling Conference - form only #10 served on Sept. 30, 2019. (Fields, Gary) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge David O. Carter. Scheduling Conference set for 11/4/2019 @ 8:30 AM before Judge David O. Carter. (dgo)
|
|
Filing 9
INITIAL STANDING ORDER FOLLOWING ASSIGNMENT OF CIVIL CASE TO JUDGE CARTER upon filing of the complaint by Judge David O. Carter. (dgo)
|
| Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant Jesus Rodriguez Garcia.(Fields, Gary) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Jesus Rodriguez Garcia, identifying Plaza Insurance Co., Insurer for Defendant. (Fields, Gary) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #2 . The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (car) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT of Eastern Division Removal Case. This case was initially assigned to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and referred to Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani for discovery. Pursuant to General Order 19-03, this case has been randomly reassigned to District Judge David O. Carter. The case number on all documents filed with the Court in this case should read as follows: 5:19-cv-01827 DOC (SHKx). (car) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Jesus Rodriguez Garcia. (Fields, Gary) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from San Bernardino Superior Court, case number CIV DS1922031 with filing fee previously paid (400 paid on 09/24/2019, receipt number 26KDHUC3), filed by Defendant Jesus Rodriguez Garcia. (Attorney Gary David Fields added to party Jesus Rodriguez Garcia(pty:dft))(Fields, Gary) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: You have attempted to open this case electronically but have failed to upload successfully the required PDF version of any initiating document, such as a complaint or notice of removal. You must file an initiating document within two business days of this notice or the docket for this case number will be closed. A case-initiating document was submitted without payment of the full filing fee. Within two business days of this notice, counsel must pay the filing fee or file a request to proceed in forma pauperis;otherwise, the docket for this case number will be closed and no further filings will be permitted under this case number. The filing fee may be paid online by docketing the event Pay Filing Fee. (ghap) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does, Jesus Rodriguez Garcia, filed by Plaintiffs Wayne Scissons, Patricia Scissons. Filed in State Court on 7/26/19 Submitted with Exhibit A to notice of removal #2 (car) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
