RE Notes, Instruments and Investments, LLC v. Betina Lorton
RE Notes, Instruments and Investments, LLC |
Bettina Lorton |
5:2019cv01842 |
September 25, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Eastern Division - Riverside Office |
Kenly Kiya Kato |
James V Selna |
Rent Lease & Ejectment |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1443 (1) Notice of Removal - Rent, Lease & Ejectment |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 MINUTE ORDER [IN CHAMBERS] Order Regarding Motion for a Declaration that Bettina Lorton is a Vexatious Litigant and for Issuance of a Pre-Filing Order by Judge James V. Selna: Plaintiff RE Notes, Instruments and Investments, LLCs motion for a declaration that Bettina Lorton is a vexatious litigant and for issuance of a pre-filing order (Mot., Dkt. No. 7) is referred to Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. Accordingly, the Court VACATES the hearing set before Judge Selna on November 4, 2019. (es) |
Filing 17 Receipt of Transmittal CV-103 Remand to Superior Court received 10/7/2019 (es) |
Filing 15 Mail Returned (Return to Sender, Insufficient Address) addressed to Bettina Lorton 11220 Palm Drive No. 209 Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 re Notice of Reassignment of Eastern Division Removal Case (CV-106) - optional html form, #3 (et) |
Filing 14 Mail Returned (return to sender not deliverable as addressed) addressed to Bettins Lorton 11220 Pal Drive No. 209 Desert Hot Springs, Ca 92240 re Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program (ADR-8) - optional html form #5 . (et) |
Filing 13 Mail Returned (Return to sender) addressed to Bettina Lorton, 11220 Palm Drive No. 209 Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 re Order to Remand Case to State Court #10 (es) |
Filing 12 Mail Returned (return to sender not deliverable as addressed) addressed to Bettins Lorton 11220 Pal Drive No. 209 Desert Hot Springs, Ca 92240 re Order on Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60) #9 (es) |
Filing 11 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Riverside County Superior Court. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Riverside County Superior Court. (es) |
Filing 8 EX PARTE APPLICATION to Shorten Time for Hearing on re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Order for Declaration that Bettina Lorton is a Vexatious Litigant and for Issuance of a Pre-Filing Order #7 to As soon as it can be heard filed by Plaintiff RE Notes, Instruments and Investments, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Smith, Jason) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Order for Declaration that Bettina Lorton is a Vexatious Litigant and for Issuance of a Pre-Filing Order filed by Plaintiff RE Notes, Instruments and Investments, LLC. Motion set for hearing on 11/4/2019 at 01:30 PM before Judge James V. Selna. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum Memorandum of Points and Authorities, #2 Memorandum Request for Judicial Notice, #3 Exhibit Exhibits 1 through 22 to Request for Judicial Notice, #4 Proposed Order) (Attorney Jason Kelly Smith added to party RE Notes, Instruments and Investments, LLC(pty:pla)) (Smith, Jason) |
Filing 10 ORDER REMANDING CASE TO STATE COURT by Judge James V. Selna. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this matter be, and hereby is, REMANDED to the Superior Court of California listed above, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Made JS-6 (es) |
Filing 9 ORDER by Judge James V. Selna, DENYING #4 REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that: This case is hereby REMANDED to state court. (es) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
Filing 4 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Defendant Bettina Lorton. (jtil) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT of Eastern Division Removal Case. This case was initially assigned to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and referred to Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato for discovery. Pursuant to General Order 19-03, this case has been randomly reassigned to District Judge James V. Selna. The case number on all documents filed with the Court in this case should read as follows: 5:19-cv-01842-JVS-KKx. (jtil) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Bettina Lorton. (jtil) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Riverside Superior Court, filed by Defendant Bettina Lorton. Case number PSC1904528 with copy complaint. Case assigned to Judge James V. Selna, Discovery to Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. #1 cv71) (jtil). Modified on 9/30/2019 (jtil). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: RE Notes, Instruments and Investments, LLC v. Betina Lorton | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Bettina Lorton | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: RE Notes, Instruments and Investments, LLC | |
Represented By: | Jason Kelly Smith |
Represented By: | Curtis A Cavalletto |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.