Robert Jordan v. Charles W. Callahan
| Robert Stewart Jordan |
| Charles W. Callahan |
| 5:2019cv01883 |
| October 1, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dean D Pregerson |
| Karen E Scott |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT'S EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE A MOTION TO DISMISS OR AN ANSWER TO THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Respondent is granted an extension of time, through December 20, 2019, to file a motion to dismiss or answer to the petition for writ of habeas corpus. #6 (et)
|
| Filing 6 EX PARTE APPLICATION for Extension of Time to File Response to the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Respondent Charles W. Callahan. (Piazza, Linnea) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Linnea Daya Piazza on behalf of Respondent Charles W. Callahan (Attorney Linnea Daya Piazza added to party Charles W. Callahan(pty:res))(Piazza, Linnea) |
| Filing 4 FINANCIAL ENTRY: Received $5.00 from Robert Stewart Jordan. Re: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254) #1 . Receipt number LA196394. (jo) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER REQUIRING RESPONSE TO HABEAS PETITION by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. Notice: The court has issued a ruling on preliminary review. Pursuant to the Agreement on Acceptance of Service between the Clerk of Court and the California Attorney General's Office, this Notice constitutes service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. (Attachments: #1 Petition, #2 Consent form CV-11B) (jdo)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Dean D. Pregerson and referred to Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (Attachments: #1 CV-111 and CV-69P) (ghap) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In State Custody (28:2254) Case assigned to Judge Dean D. Pregerson and referred to Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott.(Filing fee $ 5: FEE DUE.), filed by petitioner Robert Stewart Jordan. (ghap) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Robert Jordan v. Charles W. Callahan | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Charles W. Callahan | |
| Represented By: | Linnea Daya Piazza |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Robert Stewart Jordan | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
