Hollywood et al v. Storquest Inc. et al
| Arogant Hollywood and Alison Helen Fairchild |
| Does 1-10, BTC-Storquest LLC, Storquest Rancho Cucamonga, John Doe, Storquest Parker LLC, Alexis Licea, Storquest Inc. and Tyrone Grace |
| 5:2019cv01890 |
| October 2, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jesus G Bernal |
| Gail J Standish |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 12, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
INITIAL ORDER IN CIVIL RIGHTS CASES by Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. (efc)
|
|
Filing 16
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish: denying #5 Application for Pro Se Electronic Filing; denying #6 Application for Pro Se Electronic Filing. The Applications are DENIED for the reasons set forth in the Court's Order of October 31, 2018, Docket No. 25 in Case No. 5:18-cv-01664-JGB (GJS). (efc)
|
|
Filing 15
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish re Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis #4 and Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis #3 . On October 4, 2019, however, Plaintiffs paid the filing fee for this action. Accordingly, the Requests have been mooted, and the Clerk's Office is DIRECTED to administratively terminate Docket Nos. 3-4.. (efc)
|
| Filing 18 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Referred), #1 as to Defendant Storquest Inc (Santa Monica, CA). (efc) |
| Filing 14 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Referred), #1 as to Defendant Tyrone Grace. (efc) |
| Filing 13 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Referred), #1 as to Defendant Alexis Licea. (efc) |
| Filing 12 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Referred), #1 as to Defendant Storquest Inc.. (efc) |
| Filing 11 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Referred), #1 as to Defendant Storquest Parker LLC. (efc) |
| Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Referred), #1 as to Defendant BTC-Storquest LLC. (efc) |
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Referred), #1 as to Defendant Storquest Rancho Cucamonga. (efc) |
| Filing 8 FINANCIAL ENTRY: Received $400 into the registry of the Court from Arogant Hollywood. Re: Complaint - (Referred), #1 . Receipt number LA195942. (cp) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and referred to Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. (lh) |
| Filing 6 APPLICATION for Pro Se Litigant to electronically file documents in a specific case, filed by Plaintiff Alison Helen Fairchild. (lh) |
| Filing 5 APPLICATION for Pro Se Litigant to electronically file documents in a specific case, filed by Plaintiff Arogant Hollywood. (lh) |
| Filing 4 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Alison Helen Fairchild. (lh) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Arogant Hollywood. (lh) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs Alison Helen Fairchild, Arogant Hollywood. (lh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed against Defendants BTC-Storquest LLC, John Doe Customer 1, John Doe Customer 2, Does 1-10, Tyrone Grace, Alexis Licea, Storquest Inc., Storquest Parker LLC, Storquest Rancho Cucamonga. Case assigned to Judge Jesus G. Bernal and referred to Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. Filed by Plaintiffs Alison Helen Fairchild, Arogant Hollywood. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (lh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
