Heather Gimble v. Midland Credit Management, Inc
| Heather Gimble |
| Midland Credit Management, Inc |
| 5:2019cv02110 |
| November 4, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jesus G Bernal |
| Kenly Kiya Kato |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Heather Gimble, upon Defendant Midland Credit Management, Inc served on 12/11/2019, answer due 1/1/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Lynanne Gares, person authorized to accept in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Zelman, Yitzchak) |
| Filing 16 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to defendant Midland Credit Management, Inc. (twdb) |
| Filing 15 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Heather Gimble. (Zelman, Yitzchak) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #13 . The following error(s) was found: The caption of the summons must match the caption of the complaint verbatim. If the caption is too large to fit in the space provided, enter the name of the first party and then write see attached.Next, attach a face page of the complaint or a second page addendum to the Summons. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (twdb) |
| Filing 13 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Heather Gimble. (Zelman, Yitzchak) |
Filing 12
ORDER by Judge Jesus G. Bernal: Granting #11 Non-Resident Attorney Yitzchak Zelman APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Heather Gimble Plaintiff, designating Jonathan A. Stieglitz as local counsel. (twdb)
|
| Filing 11 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Yitzchak Zelman to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Heather Gimble (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-24832692) filed by plaintiff Heather Gimble. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit) (Stieglitz, Jonathan) |
|
Filing 10
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Jesus G. Bernal. (ima)
|
| Filing 9 RESPONSE filed by Pro Hac Vice attorney Yitzchak Zelman on behalf of Plaintiff Heather Gimble. RE: Notice of Filing Fee Due. PHV fee N/A. My office is awaiting receipt of my current certificates of good standing which are required in order to file my pro hac vice application. (lt) |
| Filing 8 RESPONSE filed by Pro Hac Vice attorney Yitzchak Zelman on behalf of Plaintiff Heather Gimble. RE: Notice of Filing Fee Due. PHV fee N/A. My office is awaiting receipt of my current certificates of good standing which are required in order to file my pro hac vice application. (lt) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Jonathan Aaron Stieglitz on behalf of Plaintiff Heather Gimble (Stieglitz, Jonathan) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Yitzchak Zelman. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. (lh) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Heather Gimble, (Stieglitz, Jonathan) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Heather Gimble. (Stieglitz, Jonathan) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24725127 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Heather Gimble. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Attorney Jonathan Aaron Stieglitz added to party Heather Gimble(pty:pla))(Stieglitz, Jonathan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Heather Gimble v. Midland Credit Management, Inc | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Heather Gimble | |
| Represented By: | Jonathan Aaron Stieglitz |
| Represented By: | Yitzchak Zelman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Midland Credit Management, Inc | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
