Raad Othman v. Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC, et al
Raad Othman |
Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC and Does 1 to 50, inclusive |
5:2019cv02118 |
November 5, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Jesus G Bernal |
Shashi H Kewalramani |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 REPLY First NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss the seventh and eighth causes of action in plaintiff's Complaint #10 filed by Defendant Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC. (Kennon, Alicia) |
Filing 18 Notice of Lodging Opposition re: First NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss the seventh and eighth causes of action in plaintiff's Complaint #10 filed by Plaintiff Raad Othman. (Rothman, Ben) |
Filing 17 MEMORANDUM in Opposition to First NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss the seventh and eighth causes of action in plaintiff's Complaint #10 Proposed Order re: Defendant's Motion to Dismiss filed by Plaintiff Raad Othman. (Rothman, Ben) |
Filing 16 MEMORANDUM in Opposition to First NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss the seventh and eighth causes of action in plaintiff's Complaint #10 filed by Plaintiff Raad Othman. (Rothman, Ben) |
Filing 15 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Elyza Parvonne Eshaghi counsel for Defendant Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC. Adding Elyza P. Eshaghi as counsel of record for Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC. (Attorney Elyza Parvonne Eshaghi added to party Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC(pty:dft))(Eshaghi, Elyza) |
Filing 14 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Robert Mansour Hensley counsel for Defendant Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC. Robert M. Hensley is no longer counsel of record for the aforementioned party in this case for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC. (Hensley, Robert) |
Filing 13 STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Jesus G. Bernal. (ima) |
Filing 12 NOTICE OF LODGING filed [Proposed] Order Re Defendant's Motion to Dismiss re Deficiency in Electronically Filed Documents (G-112A) - optional html form,, #11 (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Hensley, Robert) |
Filing 11 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss the seventh and eighth causes of action in plaintiff's Complaint #10 . The following error(s) was/were found: Proposed Document was not submitted as separate attachment. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (ad) |
Filing 10 First NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss the seventh and eighth causes of action in plaintiff's Complaint filed by Defendant Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC. Motion set for hearing on 1/13/2020 at 09:00 AM before Judge Jesus G. Bernal. (Hensley, Robert) |
Filing 9 SCHEDULING NOTICE and ORDER by Judge Jesus G. Bernal. The Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 7) is hereby STRICKEN. The Motion lacks proper notice (See L.R. 7-4). Second, the motion has been docketed using a date in which this court does not hear motions. Judge Bernal hears motions on Mondays at 9:00 a.m. Counsel shall review the court's website at www.cacd.uscourts.gov/honorable-jesus-g-bernal. Counsel may refile the motion. IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (mga) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF LODGING filed Proposed Order re First NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Dismiss Certain Causes of Action alleged by Plaintiff Raad Othman in his Complaint #7 (Hensley, Robert) |
Filing 7 (STRICKEN - See Dkt. No. 9) First NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Dismiss Certain Causes of Action alleged by Plaintiff Raad Othman in his Complaint filed by Defendant Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC. Motion set for hearing on 12/11/2019 at 09:00 AM before Judge Jesus G. Bernal. (Hensley, Robert) Modified on 11/12/2019 (mga). |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. (esa) |
Filing 4 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC, (Hensley, Robert) |
Filing 3 DECLARATION of Lindsay Wilbert re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 Declaration of Lindsay Wilbert filed by Defendant Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC. (Hensley, Robert) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC. (Hensley, Robert) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Riverside Superior Court, case number RIC1904601 Receipt No: 0973-24731079 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC. (Attorney Robert Mansour Hensley added to party Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC(pty:dft))(Hensley, Robert) |
CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against defendants Does, Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC, Jury Demand, filed by plaintiff Raad Othman. (filed in state court 9/5/19, submitted as document 1, p. 10) (esa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.