3100 Van Buren Boulevard Apartments Investors LLC v. Dasia Jones et al
Plaintiff: 3100 Van Buren Boulevard Apartments Investors LLC
Defendant: DOES 1 to 10, inclusive and Dasia Jones
Case Number: 5:2019cv02182
Filed: November 13, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Office: Eastern Division - Riverside Office
Presiding Judge: Kenly Kiya Kato
Referring Judge: Otis D Wright
Nature of Suit: Rent Lease & Ejectment
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1443 (1) Notice of Removal - Rent, Lease & Ejectment
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 19, 2019 Filing 8 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Riverside County Superior Court- Corona. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Riverside County Superior Court- Corona, No.COC 1906984 (lc)
November 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER REMANDING CASE TO STATE COURT by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: Case is Remanded to Riverside County Superior Court, Corona District, Case number COC 1906984 Case Terminated. Made JS-6 (lc)
November 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER DENYING REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis #3 . Case is remanded to state court by Judge Otis D. Wright, II (lc)
November 13, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil)
November 13, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT of Eastern Division Removal Case. This case was initially assigned to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and referred to Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato for discovery. Pursuant to General Order 19-03, this case has been randomly reassigned to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. The case number on all documents filed with the Court in this case should read as follows: 5:19-CV-02182 JGB (KKx). (jtil)
November 13, 2019 Filing 3 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Defendant Dasia Jones. (jtil)
November 13, 2019 Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Dasia Jones. (jtil)
November 13, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Riverside Superior Court, filed by Defendant Dasia Jones case number COC 1906984, with copy of complaint. Case assigned to Judge Otis D. Wright, II, Discovery to Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. (Attachments: #1 CV-71) (jtil)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: 3100 Van Buren Boulevard Apartments Investors LLC v. Dasia Jones et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DOES 1 to 10, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dasia Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: 3100 Van Buren Boulevard Apartments Investors LLC
Represented By: Kristin Danielle Molloy
Represented By: Shelley M Crawford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?