Katrina Harris v. 68-444 Perez, Inc. et al
Katrina Harris |
Does 4-100, 68-444 Perez, Inc. dba Showgirls, Doe Managers 1-3, Abdul Wahab Shawkat, 68-444 Perez, Inc. and Does 4-100, inclusive |
5:2019cv02184 |
November 13, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Jesus G Bernal |
Sheri Pym |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 ORDER by Judge Jesus G. Bernal, Approving Stipulation for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply #12 . IT IS HEREBY ordered that defendants' time to respond to the Complaint, and the time for the parties to engage in their Rule 26 meeting, be, and hereby is, extended to 1/17/2020. ( Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 1/17/2020.) (twdb) |
Filing 13 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of MJDAP case from Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato to Judge Jesus G. Bernal for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judges 5:19-cv-02184 JGB(SPx). (rn) |
Filing 12 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Response to Complaint filed by Defendant 68-444 Perez, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Attorney Steven J Shapero added to party 68-444 Perez, Inc.(pty:dft))(Shapero, Steven) |
Filing 11 Joint STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to 68-444 Perez, Inc. answer now due 1/5/2020; Abdul Wahab Shawkat answer now due 1/5/2020, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Katrina Harris.(Kristensen, John) |
Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Katrina Harris, upon Defendant Abdul Wahab Shawkat served on 11/15/2019, answer due 12/6/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Abdul Wahab Shawkat in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Kristensen, John) |
Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Katrina Harris, upon Defendant 68-444 Perez, Inc. served on 11/15/2019, answer due 12/6/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon 68-444 Perez, Inc. dba Showgirls in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Kristensen, John) |
Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Abdul Wahab Shawkat. (et) |
Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant 68-444 Perez, Inc. (et) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. (Attachments: #1 CV11C- Statement of Consent) (et) |
Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Katrina Harris. (Kristensen, John) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Katrina Harris. (Kristensen, John) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Katrina Harris, (Kristensen, John) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Katrina Harris. (Kristensen, John) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24776728 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Katrina Harris. (Attorney John P Kristensen added to party Katrina Harris(pty:pla))(Kristensen, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.