Sarah Carroll v. American Tire Distributors, Inc. et al
| Sarah Carroll |
| American Tire Distributors, Inc. and Does 1 through 20 |
| 5:2019cv02193 |
| November 14, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Shashi H Kewalramani |
| John A Kronstadt |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER SETTING RULE 16(b)/26(f) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Counsel shall file a Joint Report consistent with this Order. A hearing is not necessary and, therefore, the matter is taken under submission. Upon review of the Joint Report, a scheduling order will be issued. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 2/14/2020. (ake)
|
|
Filing 9
STANDING ORDERS FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Please read each Order carefully as they differ in some respects from the Local Rules. Counsel are advised that the Court, at any time, may amend one or more of its Standing Orders. It is the responsibility of counsel to refer to this Court's Procedures and Schedules found on the website for the United States District Court, Central District of California (www.cacd.uscourts.gov) to obtain the operative order. The Court thanks the parties and their counsel for their anticipated cooperation in carrying out these requirements. (ake)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT of Eastern Division Removal Case. This case was initially assigned to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and referred to Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani for discovery. Pursuant to General Order 19-03, this case has been randomly reassigned to District Judge John A. Kronstadt. The case number on all documents filed with the Court in this case should read as follows: 5:19-cv-02193 JAK (SHKx). (ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant American Tire Distributors, Inc. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 11/12/2019 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT B)(ghap) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants American Tire Distributors, Inc., Does 1 through 20, filed by plaintiff Sarah Carroll. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 9/24/2019 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT A) (ghap) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant American Tire Distributors, Inc., re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 served on November 14, 2019. (Williams, Tracy) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Defendant American Tire Distributors, Inc.. Related Case(s): 0 (Williams, Tracy) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant American Tire Distributors, Inc., identifying Plaintiff Sarah Carroll, Kirk Law Group, P.C. - Counsel for Plaintiff. (Williams, Tracy) |
| Filing 3 DECLARATION of Laurie C. Heavner re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant American Tire Distributors, Inc.. (Williams, Tracy) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant American Tire Distributors, Inc.. (Williams, Tracy) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from San Bernardino Superior Court, case number CIVDS1928629 Receipt No: 0973-24782701 - Fee: $400, filed by Sarah Carroll American Tire Distributors, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Summons & Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Answer) (Attorney Tracy R Williams added to party American Tire Distributors, Inc.(pty:dft))(Williams, Tracy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
