Kenneth Michael Wilcox v. L.J. Milusnic et al
| Kenneth Michael Wilcox |
| Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Prisons and L.J. Milusnic |
| 5:2019cv02215 |
| November 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Cormac J Carney |
| Patrick J Walsh |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) Screening of Plaintiff's Civil Rights Complaint (Doc. No. 1.) by Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Walsh. Plaintiff may file a First Amended Complaint on the attached form no later than January 31, 2020, (See document for details.) (Attachments: #1 Attachment) (sbou) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Cormac J. Carney and referred to Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Walsh. (car) |
Filing 4
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Walsh: granting #2 REQUEST for Leave to Proceed without Prepayment of Filing Fee.. (sbou)
|
| Filing 2 REQUEST to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Kenneth Michael Wilcox. (car) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed against Defendants pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. Case assigned to Judge Cormac J. Carney and referred to Magistrate Judge Patrick J Walsh, filed by Plaintiff Kenneth Michael Wilcox. (car) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
