Judy Fulton v. Andrew Saul
Judy Fulton |
Andrew Saul |
5:2019cv02225 |
November 20, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
John D Early |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 NOTICE TO COUNSEL: ALL PARTIES having consented to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge, this case has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge John D. Early for all further proceedings. Please use the case number 5:19-cv-02225 JDE on all documents subsequently filed to ensure the proper routing of all filings. RE: Consent to Proceed before U S Magistrate Judge (AUSA filers only) - Non-Final #10 , Consent to Proceed before U S Magistrate Judge (non-AUSA) - Non-Final #9 . THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. TEXT ONLY ENTRY. (rn) |
Filing 10 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Andrew Saul. (Attorney Paul H Sachelari added to party Andrew Saul(pty:dft))(Sachelari, Paul) |
Filing 9 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), (Safa, Cyrus) |
Filing 8 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Judy Fulton, upon Defendant Andrew Saul served on 12/5/2019, answer due 4/3/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. Original Summons NOT returned. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Safa, Cyrus) |
Filing 7 MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) Order re: Procedures in Social Security Appeal by Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (see document for details) (hr) |
Filing 6 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Andrew Saul. (et) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald and referred to Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (et) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Judy Fulton, (Safa, Cyrus) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Judy Fulton. (Safa, Cyrus) |
Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Judy Fulton. (Safa, Cyrus) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24819645 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Judy Fulton. (Attorney Cyrus Safa added to party Judy Fulton(pty:pla))(Safa, Cyrus) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Judy Fulton v. Andrew Saul | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Andrew Saul | |
Represented By: | Paul H Sachelari |
Represented By: | Assistant US Attorney LA-CV |
Represented By: | Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Judy Fulton | |
Represented By: | Cyrus Safa |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.