Neil Prescott v. Mayo Clinic of Arizona and Minnesota et al
Plaintiff: Neil Prescott
Defendant: An Intestate Corporation in Minnesota, Arizona and Florida, Incorporated in Minnesota, Arizona and Florida and Mayo Clinic of Arizona and Minnesota
Case Number: 5:2019cv02249
Filed: November 25, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Andre Birotte
Referring Judge: Shashi H Kewalramani
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 23, 2020 Filing 14 STIPULATION to Dismiss All Parties United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Attorney Grace Y Park added to party United States of America(pty:ip))(Park, Grace)
January 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER OF DISMISSAL by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: In accordance with the parties' Stipulation #12 and Plaintiff's "Motion for Case Cessation" #11 , the Court ORDERS that this matter is DISMISSED in its entirety, with prejudice, with each party to bear their own fees and costs. ( Case Terminated. Made JS-6. ) (gk)
January 21, 2020 Filing 12 STIPULATION to Dismiss Defendant Mayo Clinic of Arizona and Minnesota filed by Plaintiff Mayo Clinic of Arizona and Minnesota. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order of Dismissal)(Ayoub, Rosaline)
January 10, 2020 Filing 11 MOTION for Case Cessation filed by Plaintiff Neil Prescott. (gk)
December 20, 2019 Filing 10 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Rosaline Ayoub counsel for Defendant Mayo Clinic of Arizona and Minnesota. Adding Rosaline S. Ayoub as counsel of record for Mayo Clinic of Arizona and Minnesota for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Mayo Clinic of Arizona. (Attorney Rosaline Ayoub added to party Mayo Clinic of Arizona and Minnesota(pty:dft))(Ayoub, Rosaline)
December 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 NOTICE OF DOCUMENT DISCREPANCIES AND ORDER by Judge Andre Birotte Jr., ORDERING Amendment No. 2 to the Complaint submitted by Plaintiff Neil Prescott received on 12/4/2019 is not to be filed but instead rejected. Denial based on: Leave of Court is needed to file a second amended complaint. (gk)
December 9, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 NOTICE OF DOCUMENT DISCREPANCIES AND ORDER by Judge Andre Birotte Jr., ORDERING Civil Complaint - Motion for Discovery submitted by Plaintiff Neil Prescott received on 12/5/2019 is not to be filed but instead rejected. Denial based on: Document does not comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (gk)
December 5, 2019 Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Defendant Mayo Clinic of Arizona and Minnesota. upon Neil Prescott waiver sent by Plaintiff on 12/3/2019, answer due 2/3/2020. Waiver of Service signed by Rosaline S. Ayoub. (Ayoub, Rosaline)
December 2, 2019 Filing 6 CIVIL COMPLAINT AMENDMENT NO. 1 against Defendants Mayo Clinic of Arizona and Minnesota, An Intestate Corporation in Minnesota, Arizona and Florida, Incorporated in Minnesota, Arizona and Florida; amending Complaint #1 ; filed by Plaintiff Neil Prescott. (gk)
November 27, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (cb)
November 25, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap)
November 25, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Andre Birotte Jr and Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. (ghap)
November 25, 2019 Filing 2 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Neil Prescott. (ghap)
November 25, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendants An Intestate Corporation in Minnesota, Arizona and Florida, Incorporated in Minnesota, Arizona and Florida, Mayo Clinic of Arizona and Minnesota.Case assigned to Judge Andre Birotte Jr for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Shashi H Kewalramani.(Filing fee $ 400:PAID) Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiff Neil Prescott. (Attachments: #1 CV-71) (ghap)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Neil Prescott v. Mayo Clinic of Arizona and Minnesota et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: An Intestate Corporation in Minnesota, Arizona and Florida
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Incorporated in Minnesota, Arizona and Florida
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mayo Clinic of Arizona and Minnesota
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Neil Prescott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?