Gonzalo J. Ibanez v. Raymond Madden
Petitioner: Gonzalo J. Ibanez
Respondent: Raymond Madden
Case Number: 5:2019cv02280
Filed: November 27, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: David O Carter
Referring Judge: Charles F Eick
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28:2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. It is Ordered that Petitioner shall serve upon Respondent or, if appearance has been entered by counsel, upon Respondent's attorneys, a copy of every future pleading or other document submitted for consideration by the Court. (sp)
December 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER REQUIRING ANSWER TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS by Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. It is Ordered that Respondent file an Answer to the Petition within 23 days of the date of this Order. All lodged documents must be numbered sequentially. Each lodged document must be stapled or otherwise securely fastened, and must bear the lodgment number and case number on the first page of the document. It is Further Ordered that, if Petitioner desires to file a Reply to the Answer, Petitioner shall do so within 15 days of the date that the Answer is filed. It is Further Ordered that Respondent shall give timely notice of any court proceeding to any person who is a "crime victim" within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. section 3771. Notice: The court has issued a ruling on preliminary review. Pursuant to the Agreement on Acceptance of Service between the Clerk of Court and the California Attorney Generals Office, this Notice constitutes service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. (Attachments: #1 Petition, #2 Election, #3 Notice) (sp)
November 27, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge David O. Carter and referred to Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (Attachments: #1 CV-111 Notice) (car)
November 27, 2019 Filing 2 ELECTION REGARDING CONSENT TO PROCEED before a United States Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Petitioner Gonzalo J. Ibanez. (car)
November 27, 2019 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In State Custody (28:2254) Case assigned to Judge David O. Carter and referred to Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick.(Filing fee $ 5. FEE DUE), filed by Petitioner Gonzalo J. Ibanez. (car)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gonzalo J. Ibanez v. Raymond Madden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Raymond Madden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Gonzalo J. Ibanez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?