Bryan Estrada v. Wanggi Investment Co. et al
| Bryan Estrada |
| Wanggi Investment Co., Hose Specialist, Inc. and Does 1-10, inclusive |
| 5:2019cv02349 |
| December 6, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jesus G Bernal |
| Shashi H Kewalramani |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Hose Specialist, Inc. answer now due 2/14/2020, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Hose Specialist, Inc..(Attorney Hyunsuk A Chang added to party Hose Specialist, Inc.(pty:dft))(Chang, Hyunsuk) |
| Filing 15 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Wanggi Investment Co. answer now due 2/7/2020, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Wanggi Investment Co..(Attorney Hyunsuk A Chang added to party Wanggi Investment Co.(pty:dft))(Chang, Hyunsuk) |
| Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Bryan Estrada, upon Defendant Hose Specialist, Inc. served on 12/26/2019, answer due 1/16/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Hose Specialist, Inc. by Veronica S. Munoz, Agent in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and no service by mail was executed.Original Summons NOT returned. (Cornell, Ross) |
| Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Bryan Estrada, upon Defendant Wanggi Investment Co. served on 12/19/2019, answer due 1/9/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Wanggi Investment Co. by Kim Doe, Occupant in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Cornell, Ross) |
Filing 12
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Jesus G. Bernal. (ima)
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Plaintiff Bryan Estrada. correcting Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Errata #9 (Cornell, Ross) |
| Filing 10 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Bryan Estrada. (Cornell, Ross) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF ERRATA filed by Plaintiff Bryan Estrada. correcting Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 (Cornell, Ross) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Civil Cover Sheet #2 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): Incorrect Document Attached. You may file a Notice of Errata and re-file the corrected document using the appropriate docketing event. (lh) |
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Hose Specialist, Inc., Wanggi Investment Co. (lh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. (lh) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Bryan Estrada. (Cornell, Ross) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Bryan Estrada, (Cornell, Ross) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Bryan Estrada. (Cornell, Ross) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24905472 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Bryan Estrada. (Attorney Ross Cornell added to party Bryan Estrada(pty:pla))(Cornell, Ross) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
