Efren Iniguez-Delgadillo v. Warden Scott Frauenheim
Efren Iniguez-Delgadillo |
Warden Scott Frauenheim |
5:2019cv02369 |
December 10, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
David O Carter |
John E McDermott |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 OPPOSITION to: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #5 filed by Petitioner Efren Iniguez-Delgadillo. (sbou) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF LODGING filed re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case #5 , Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254) #1 (Attachments: #1 Lod 1.pdf, #2 Lod 2 (RT 1).pdf, #3 Lod 2 (RT 2).pdf, #4 Lod 3.pdf, #5 Lod 4.pdf, #6 Lod 5.pdf, #7 Lod 6.pdf, #8 Lod 7.pdf, #9 Lod 8.pdf, #10 Lod 9.pdf, #11 Lod 10.pdf)(LaPietra, Vincent) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case filed by Respondent Scott Frauenheim. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support) (LaPietra, Vincent) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE of California Attorney General Office Vincent P. LaPietra on behalf of Respondent Scott Frauenheim. (Attorney Vincent P LaPietra added to party Scott Frauenheim(pty:res))(LaPietra, Vincent) |
Filing 3 ORDER REQUIRING RESPONSE TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AND INSTRUCTIONS GOVERNING FURTHER PROCEEDINGS by Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott: that Respondent Scott Frauenheim file Answer to the Petition not later than 1/13/2020. Notice: The court has issued a ruling on preliminary review. Pursuant to the Agreement on Acceptance of Service between the Clerk of Court and the California Attorney Generals Office, this Notice constitutes service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. Motions to Dismiss shall be filed by 1/13/2020. Traverse due by 2/10/2020 (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1, #2 Attachment 2) (sbou) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge David O. Carter and referred to Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (Attachments: #1 CV-111) (lh) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In State Custody (28:2254). Case assigned to Judge David O. Carter and referred to Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. (Filing Fee $ 5 Due), filed by Petitioner Efren Iniguez-Delgadillo. (lh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Efren Iniguez-Delgadillo v. Warden Scott Frauenheim | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Efren Iniguez-Delgadillo | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Warden Scott Frauenheim | |
Represented By: | Vincent P LaPietra |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.